Garrettsville Criminal Lawyer, Ohio, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Michael Washington
About | Practice Areas
Washington Law, LLC
P.O. Box 944 Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44223» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Experience Makes the Difference

We take the time to research your situation completely and bring about the most effective opportunities ensuring you get the successful outcome you deserve.

800-851-6480
1. Michael Washington Cuyahoga Falls, OH
  Attorney at Law - OH, 2001
2. AboutWashington Law, LLC
  Experience You Can Trust
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Daniel Gerard Keating

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Lawsuit & Dispute, Real Estate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

170 Monroe Street, Nw, Warren, OH 44483

Pamela Ann Rintala

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Corporate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

220 Main Ave Sw, Warren, OH 44481

William John Danso

Government, Criminal, Religious Discrimination, Litigation

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

160 High St Nw, Warren, OH 44481

Gina Buccino Arnaut

Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

160 High St Nw, Warren, OH 44481

Christopher Dean Becker

Litigation, Government, Criminal, Religious Discrimination

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

160 High St Nw, Warren, OH 44481

Jeffrey Ryan Davis

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

161 High St Nw, Warren, OH 44481

Dax William Alexander Kerr

International Other, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

111 High St Ne, Warren, OH 44481

Cynthia Westcott Rice

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

111 High St Ne, Warren, OH 44481

Karl Rudolf Rissland

Other, Estate, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

9442 State Route 43, Streetsboro, OH 44241

Rick B. Wood

Workers' Compensation, Personal Injury, Criminal, Corporate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 41 Years

CONTACT

9294 State Rt 43, Streetsboro, OH 44241

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

SENTENCE

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by ... (more...)

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by the trial judge; the jury chooses the sentence only in a capital case, when it must choose between life in prison without parole and death.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

BAIL

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all requi... (more...)

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all required court appearances. The amount of bail is determined by the local bail schedule, which is based on the seriousness of the offense. The judge can increase the bail if the prosecutor convinces him that the defendant is likely to flee (for example, if he has failed to show up in court in the past), or he can decrease it if the defense attorney shows that the defendant is unlikely to run (for example, he has strong ties to the community by way of a steady job and a family).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Singleton

... Court of Ohio. However, for criminal sentences imposed on and after July 11, 2006, in which a trial court failed to properly impose postrelease control, trial courts shall apply the procedures set forth in RC 2929.191. {Â¶ 2} In this ...

State v. Colon

... Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Cullen Sweeney, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Jason A. Macke, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. MOYER, CJ. ...

State v. Baker

... We have previously determined that "in order to decide whether an order issued by a trial court in a criminal proceeding is a reviewable final order, appellate courts should apply the definitions of `final order' contained in RC 2505.02." State v. Muncie (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 440 ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Garrettsville Criminal Lawyer, Ohio, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

Washington Law, LLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Daniel Gerard Keating

Pamela Ann Rintala

William John Danso

Gina Buccino Arnaut

Christopher Dean Becker

Jeffrey Ryan Davis

Dax William Alexander Kerr

Cynthia Westcott Rice

Karl Rudolf Rissland

Rick B. Wood

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

FEDERAL COURT

DIRECTED VERDICT

GRAND JURY

SENTENCE

CRIMINAL INSANITY

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

LINEUP

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

BAIL

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Singleton

State v. Colon

State v. Baker

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS