Indian Hills Employment Discrimination Lawyer, Colorado

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Sponsored Law Firm


Includes: Affirmative Action, Age Discrimination, Sex Discrimination

Carl F. Eiberger

Litigation, Employment Discrimination, Employee Rights
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  71 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Lawyer.com

TIPS

Easily find Indian Hills Employment Discrimination Lawyers and Indian Hills Employment Discrimination Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Employment areas including Employee Rights, Employment Contracts, Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), Labor Law, Occupational Safety & Health, Pension & Benefits, Sexual Harassment, Whistleblower, Workers' Compensation and Wrongful Termination attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Bonidy v. VAIL VALLEY CENTER FOR AES. DENT.

... 494, 505 (DND1976) (Title VII back pay period ended 285 on date of judgment); Filter Specialists, 906 NE2d at 850 (employment discrimination case determining the back pay period runs from the date of discharge to the date of the decision). ...

Arnold v. ANTON COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION

... 1982), and Watson v. Public Service Co., 207 P.3d 860 (Colo. App. 2008). However, because both of those cases were employment discrimination actions brought under a part of the CRA — part 4 — that is not the basis of Arnold's suit, they are inapplicable. ...

KANCILIA v. Pearson

... 1644, 118 L.Ed.2d 280 (1992). In Taylor, the debtor had obtained a judgment of liability against her employer in her employment discrimination suit, but her damages had not yet been calculated. Id. at 640, 112 S.Ct. 1644. While ...

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.