Maumelle Criminal Lawyer, Arkansas

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Judson Kidd
About | Practice Areas
Dodds, Kidd, Ryan & Rowan, Attorneys at Law
313 W. 2Nd St. Little Rock, AR 72201» view map
Criminal Defense
Unrelenting Pursuit Of Justice

Our lawyers are committed to taking the time to get to know you, your legal concerns and the ideal resolution to your case that will be meaningful to you.

800-936-8091
1. Judson Kidd Little Rock, AR
  Attorney at Law - AR, 1975
  University of Arkansas J.D. 1975
2. AboutDodds, Kidd, Ryan & Rowan, Attorneys at Law
  Over 40 years of experience.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Catherine A. Ryan

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Little Rock native Catherine Ryan joined Dodds, Kidd & Ryan in 2016 after fourteen years representing injured parties as a trial lawyer in Boston, Mas... (more)

CONTACT

833-357-3476

313 W. 2Nd Street, Little Rock, AR 72201

David Wallace Parker

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law

Former prosecutor, David Parker, joined Dodds, Kidd, Ryan & Rowan in 2017. After graduating from UALR William H. Bowen School of Law in 2008, David w... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

501-375-9901

313 W Second Street, Little Rock, AR 72201

Jacob Ian Wickliffe

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

CONTACT

313-357-3476

313 West Second Street, Little Rock, AR 72201

Judson Candler Kidd

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Social Security

I was exposed to law at an early age as my grandfather and father were trial lawyers, grandmother was a court reporter and my uncle was a US Marshall.... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-936-8091

313 W. 2Nd St., Little Rock, AR 72201

Lucas Zachary Rowan

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Lucas Zachary Rowan is a practicing lawyer in the state of Arkansas handling personal injury, criminal and family law matters.

CONTACT

866-970-3550

313 W. Second Street, Little Rock, AR 72201

Robert Alston Newcomb

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Employment

Mr. Newcomb proudly represents clients in need of Criminal and Employment matters.

CONTACT

800-970-8231

425 West Capitol, Little Rock, AR 72201

David W. Kamps

Criminal, Litigation

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

212 Center Street, Little Rock, AR 72201

Laura Robertson

Farms, Child Support, Adoption, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

2101 Main Street, North Little Rock, AR 72114

Lloyd W. "Tre" Kitchens

Litigation, Civil Rights, White Collar Crime, Mass Torts

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

500 Pleasant Valley Drive, Little Rock, AR 72227

Alexander Andres Navarro

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

640 Riverfront Dr, Maumelle, AR 72114

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the l... (more...)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the level of alcohol or drugs in the driver's body must simply be enough to prevent him from thinking clearly or driving safely. State laws specify the levels of blood alcohol content at which a person is presumed to be under the influence. Also called driving while intoxicated (DWI and drunk driving).

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, th... (more...)

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, the crime of aggravated assault is a physical attack made worse because it is committed with a dangerous weapon, results in severe bodily injury or is made in conjunction with another serious crime. Aggravated assault is usually considered a felony, punishable by a prison sentence.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Hill v. Norris

... Appellant subsequently filed in this court a petition to proceed pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 37.1 (2010) that was denied. ... Id. A court with personal and subject-matter jurisdiction over the defendant in a criminal proceeding has authority to render judgment. ...

Moore v. Hobbs

... On March 12, 2010, appellant Timothy Ramon Moore, who is incarcerated in the custody of the Arkansas Department of Correction by virtue of multiple criminal convictions, filed in the circuit court in the county where he was incarcerated a pro se petition for writ of habeas ...

State v. Rowe

... As a threshold issue, we must determine the propriety of this appeal under Rule 3 of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedureâ€”Criminal. A significant difference exists between appeals brought by criminal defendants and those brought on behalf of the State. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Maumelle Criminal Lawyer, Arkansas

Sponsored Law Firm

Dodds, Kidd, Ryan & Rowan, Attorneys at Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Catherine A. Ryan

David Wallace Parker

Jacob Ian Wickliffe

Judson Candler Kidd

Lucas Zachary Rowan

Robert Alston Newcomb

David W. Kamps

Laura Robertson

Lloyd W. "Tre" Kitchens

Alexander Andres Navarro

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

JURY NULLIFICATION

DIRECTED VERDICT

SELF-INCRIMINATION

CHARGE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Hill v. Norris

Moore v. Hobbs

State v. Rowe

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS