Rexford Misdemeanor Lawyer, Montana

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Todd Glazier
About | Practice Areas
Glazier Law Firm, P.C.
19 Main Street Kalispell, MT 59901» view map
Criminal Law
Serving the People of Northwest Montana

You can trust that we will work hard to protect your interests and give you sound legal advice.

800-856-2011
1. Todd Glazier Kalispell, MT
  Attorney at Law- MT, 1998
  Gonzaga University School of Law, J.D.
2. AboutGlazier Law Firm, P.C.
  Friendly Service, Timely Results
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Rexford Misdemeanor lawyer.
Below are all Rexford lawyers.

James Patrick Mason

Accident & Injury

Status: Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

49 Whitetail Dr, Rexford, MT 59930

Karen M. Rasmussen

General Practice

Status:

CONTACT

Eureka, MT 59917

Scott B. Johnson

Land Use & Zoning, DUI-DWI

Status: Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

Troy, MT 59935

Heathermc Dougall

Family Law

Status:

CONTACT

13843 Us Highway 2, Troy, MT 59935

Heather McDougall

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

13843 Us Highway 2, Troy, MT 59935

Jennifer D. Caramela

Family Law

Status: Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

Troy, MT 59935

L. Charles Evans

Household Mold, Federal Appellate Practice, Estate Planning, Corporate

Status: Licensed: 55 Years

CONTACT

305 W. 6th St., Libby, MT 59923

Jay Allen Forsyth

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

Libby, MT 59923

Stephen H. Dailby

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 59 Years

CONTACT

58 Edgewater Dr, Libby, MT 59923

David W Harman

Employment, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury, Household Mold

Status: Licensed: 53 Years

CONTACT

706 Northwood Avenue, Libby, MT 59923

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

BATTERY

A crime consisting of physical contact that is intended to harm someone. Unintentional harmful contact is not battery, no mater how careless the behavior or how... (more...)

A crime consisting of physical contact that is intended to harm someone. Unintentional harmful contact is not battery, no mater how careless the behavior or how severe the injury. A fist fight is a common battery; being hit by a wild pitch in a baseball game is not.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Rexford Misdemeanor Lawyer, Montana

Sponsored Law Firm

Glazier Law Firm, P.C.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

James Patrick Mason

Karen M. Rasmussen

Scott B. Johnson

Heathermc Dougall

Heather McDougall

Jennifer D. Caramela

L. Charles Evans

Jay Allen Forsyth

Stephen H. Dailby

David W Harman

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

EAVESDROPPING

HABEAS CORPUS

BATTERY

HUNG JURY

SPECIFIC INTENT

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

LARCENY

SELF-INCRIMINATION

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS