Stevens Point DUI-DWI Lawyer, Wisconsin

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Sean Flaherty
About | Practice Areas
Keches Law Group
122 Dean Street Taunton, MA 02780» view map
Social Security, Personal Injury, Workers Comp.
Protecting Your Rights

Our team of experienced personal injury attorneys has over 130 years of combined experience representing individuals and families injured due to the negligence of others.

800-713-8650
1. Sean Flaherty Taunton, MA
  Attorney at Law - MA, 2006
  New England School of Law J.D.
2. AboutKeches Law Group
  We are attorneys that care.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Social Security
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Stevens Point DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Stevens Point Criminal lawyers.

Peter C. Lloyd

✓

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Traffic, Child Custody, Child Support

Attorney Peter Lloyd is an experienced lawyer practicing law in the Central Wisconsin area. He limits his practice to specific areas (family, criminal... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-672-6840

232 W Grand Ave, Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495

Gary J. Kryshak

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law

Status:

CONTACT

262 W Grand Ave, Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495

Gregory J. Jerabek

Child Support, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Bankruptcy & Debt

Status:

CONTACT

170 3Rd St N, Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495

Brandon Carlin

DUI-DWI, Slip & Fall Accident

Status: Licensed: 8 Years

CONTACT

3273 Church Street, Stevens Point, WI 54481

Jonathan A. Barnett

Landlord-Tenant, Traffic, Workers' Compensation, DUI-DWI

Status:

CONTACT

170 Third St N, Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494

Alex Joseph Hewett

Real Estate, Divorce, Criminal, Contract

Status: Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

170 3Rd St N, Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495

James T. Quinn

Real Estate, Child Custody, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

480 E Grand Ave, Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495

Jerome J. Babiak

General Practice

Status:

CONTACT

170 3Rd St N, Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495

Jonathan E. Barnett

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

1317 College Ct, Stevens Point, WI 54481

Nathan T. Oswald

Litigation, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status:

CONTACT

400 Market St, Stevens Point, WI 54481

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

IMPRISON

To put a person in prison or jail or otherwise confine him as punishment for committing a crime.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Carter

... Id. at 100. In rejecting the plaintiff's challenge, the court clarified that a summary suspension under the "zero tolerance" law is not a summary suspension under DUI law, and therefore "[p]laintiff's reliance on DUI law is puzzling because plaintiff was not arrested for DUI." Id. ...

State v. Carter

State v. MALSBURY

... The State counters that because Malsbury's Washington conviction was originally charged as driving under the influence (DUI) and later amended to reckless driving with OWI-like penalties, the conviction counts for purposes of Wisconsin's OWI laws. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Stevens Point DUI-DWI Lawyer, Wisconsin

Sponsored Law Firm

Keches Law Group

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Peter C. Lloyd

Gary J. Kryshak

Gregory J. Jerabek

Brandon Carlin

Jonathan A. Barnett

Alex Joseph Hewett

James T. Quinn

Jerome J. Babiak

Jonathan E. Barnett

Nathan T. Oswald

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

WARRANT

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

CRIMINAL INSANITY

MCNAGHTEN RULE

FEDERAL COURT

SEARCH WARRANT

ACCOMPLICE

SPECIFIC INTENT

IMPRISON

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Carter

State v. Carter

State v. MALSBURY

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS