Toccoa DUI-DWI Lawyer, Georgia, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jonathan Hunt
About | Practice Areas
Wiseman Blackburn, LLC
1510 Drayton St Savannah, GA 31401» view map
Criminal Defense
Dedicated To You

Wiseman Blackburn serves Atlanta, GA with Criminal and Divorce and Family matters.

800-622-5610
1. Jonathan Hunt Savannah, GA
  Attorney at Law- GA
  University of Mississippi School of Law, J.D.
2. AboutWiseman Blackburn, LLC
  Dedicated To You
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

William Starr Hardman

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Insurance

Status: Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

Gainesville, GA 30503

Samuel Ray Bagwell

Real Estate, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

330 Northside Drive, Gainesville, GA 30501

William S. Hardman

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Insurance

Status: Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

Gainesville, GA 30503

Nick Primm

Divorce, Family Law, DUI-DWI, Felony, Child Support

Status: Licensed: 24 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

49 College Street, Jefferson, GA 30549

Troy R. Millikan

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury, Bankruptcy & Debt, DUI-DWI

Status:

CONTACT

380 Green Street, N.E., Gainesville, GA 30501

Michelle Hall

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

225 Green Street Se, Gainesville, GA 30501

Leonard C. Parks

Felony, Misdemeanor, DUI-DWI, Accident & Injury

Status: Licensed: 41 Years

CONTACT

Gainesville, GA 30503

Kevin Ronald Christopher

Traffic, Child Custody, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Medical Malpractice

Status: Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

64 Washington Street, Jefferson, GA 30549

John W. Timmons

DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor, Contract

Status: Licensed: 55 Years

CONTACT

244 E. Washington Street, Athens, GA 30601

Ryan John Swingle

Other, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Consumer Rights

Status: Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

244 E Washington Street, Athens, GA 30601

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CRIMINAL LAW

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not p... (more...)

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not punishable by imprisonment. In order to be found guilty of a criminal law, the prosecution must show that the defendant intended to act as he did; in civil law, you may sometimes be responsible for your actions even though you did not intend the consequences. For example, civil law makes you financially responsible for a car accident you caused but didn't intend.

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to perm... (more...)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. Each of those four parts is an element that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Underwood

... Did the Court of Appeals err in affirming the grant of a defendant's motion to suppress the results of a State-administered breath test where an officer who had probable cause to arrest a defendant for DUI read the implied consent rights of OCGA Â§ 40-5-55[ [2] ] to the defendant ...

State v. Rish

... In granting that motion, the trial court found that the State lacked probable cause to arrest Rish for DUI-less safe (OCGA Â§ 40-6-391(a)(1)). While we affirm the trial court's ruling on this issue, we also find that, as a matter of law, the State did have probable cause to arrest Rish for ...

Wade v. State

... Following a bench trial, factually stipulated for trial purposes (to preclude the State's witnesses from having to appear), while preserving the due process issues for appellate review, Brittany Wade appeals her conviction of DUI less-safe, [1] contending that her bent of mind or ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Toccoa DUI-DWI Lawyer, Georgia, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

Wiseman Blackburn, LLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

William Starr Hardman

Samuel Ray Bagwell

William S. Hardman

Nick Primm

Troy R. Millikan

Michelle Hall

Leonard C. Parks

Kevin Ronald Christopher

John W. Timmons

Ryan John Swingle

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CRIMINAL LAW

ARRAIGNMENT

MCNAGHTEN RULE

BURDEN OF PROOF

CAPITAL CASE

FEDERAL COURT

JURY NULLIFICATION

LINEUP

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Underwood

State v. Rish

Wade v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS