Babcock Child Support Lawyer, Wisconsin, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Nicholas Abts
About | Practice Areas
La Chapelle, Kryshak & Nettesheim, LLP
262 W Grand Ave Wisconsin Rapids WI 54495» view map
Divorce & Family Law
Passionate and Dedicated Attorneys

The law firm of La Chapelle, Kryshak & Nettesheim, LLP, has provided legal services to the people of central Wisconsin for over a century.

800-886-1251
1. Nicholas Abts Wisconsin Rapids, WI
  Attorney at Law- WI, 2009
  University of Wisconsin Law School, J.D. 2008
2. AboutLa Chapelle, Kryshak & Nettesheim, LLP
  Passionate and Dedicated Attorneys
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Divorce & Family Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Babcock Child Support lawyer.
Below are all Babcock Divorce & Family Law lawyers.

William R. Wick

Foreclosure, Lawsuit, Wrongful Termination, Child Support

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1425 Memorial Dr, Manitowoc, WI 54221

Kris Lynn Wright

Traffic, Wills & Probate, Child Support, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

16872 S Davis St, Galesville, WI 54630

Roberta J. Walz-O'Leary

Traffic, Employment, Child Support

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

531 Fond Du Lac Ave, Fond Du Lac, WI 54935

Patricia Sommer

Child Support

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

509 Nova Way, Madison, WI 53704

Walter W. Stern

Landlord-Tenant, Child Support, Bankruptcy, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 51 Years

CONTACT

920 85Th St, Kenosha, WI 53143

Roger A. Rustad

Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

555 Birch St, Nekoosa, WI 54457

Guy Robert Detlefsen Jr.

Family Law, Employment, Real Estate, Wills & Probate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

464 Daly Ave, Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494

Nicholas J. Brazeau

Real Estate, Lawsuit & Dispute, Estate, Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

132 1St Street N., Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494

James T. Quinn

Real Estate, Child Custody, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

480 E Grand Ave, Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495

Chelsie Ann Thuecks

Landlord-Tenant, Dispute Resolution, Child Custody, Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

170 3Rd St N, Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

GUARDIAN AD LITEM

A person, not necessarily a lawyer, who is appointed by a court to represent and protect the interests of a child or an incapacitated adult during a lawsuit. Fo... (more...)

A person, not necessarily a lawyer, who is appointed by a court to represent and protect the interests of a child or an incapacitated adult during a lawsuit. For example, a guardian ad litem (GAL) may be appointed to represent the interests of a child whose parents are locked in a contentious battle for custody, or to protect a child's interests in a lawsuit where there are allegations of child abuse. The GAL may conduct interviews and investigations, make reports to the court and participate in court hearings or mediation sessions. Sometimes called court-appointed special advocates (CASAs).

INTERLOCUTORY DECREE

A court judgment that is not final until the judge decides other matters in the case or until enough time has passed to see if the interim decision is working. ... (more...)

A court judgment that is not final until the judge decides other matters in the case or until enough time has passed to see if the interim decision is working. In the past, interlocutory decrees were most often used in divorces. The terms of the divorce were set out in an interlocutory decree, which would become final only after a waiting period. The purpose of the waiting period was to allow the couple time to reconcile. They rarely did, however, so most states no longer use interlocutory decrees of divorce.

SPLIT CUSTODY

A custody arrangement in the case of multiple children, awarding sole custody of one child to one parent and sole custody of another child to the other parent. ... (more...)

A custody arrangement in the case of multiple children, awarding sole custody of one child to one parent and sole custody of another child to the other parent. This arrangement is generally disfavored by judges because they are reluctant to split up siblings.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

An order from a judge that directs a party to come to court and convince the judge why she shouldn't grant an action proposed by the other side or by the judge ... (more...)

An order from a judge that directs a party to come to court and convince the judge why she shouldn't grant an action proposed by the other side or by the judge on her own (sua sponte). For example, in a divorce, at the request of one parent a judge might issue an order directing the other parent to appear in court on a particular date and time to show cause why the first parent should not be given sole physical custody of the children. Although it would seem that the person receiving an order to show cause is at a procedural disadvantage--she, after all, is the one who is told to come up with a convincing reason why the judge shouldn't order something--both sides normally have an equal chance to convince the judge to rule in their favor.

ACCOMPANYING RELATIVE

An immediate family member of someone who immigrates to the United States. In most cases, a person who is eligible to receive some type of visa or green card ca... (more...)

An immediate family member of someone who immigrates to the United States. In most cases, a person who is eligible to receive some type of visa or green card can also obtain green cards or similar visas for accompanying relatives. Accompanying relatives include spouses and unmarried children under the age of 21.

VISITATION RIGHTS

The right to see a child regularly, typically awarded by the court to the parent who does not have physical custody of the child. The court will deny visitation... (more...)

The right to see a child regularly, typically awarded by the court to the parent who does not have physical custody of the child. The court will deny visitation rights only if it decides that visitation would hurt the child so much that the parent should be kept away.

OPEN ADOPTION

An adoption in which there is some degree of contact between the birthparents and the adoptive parents and sometimes with the child as well. As opposed to most ... (more...)

An adoption in which there is some degree of contact between the birthparents and the adoptive parents and sometimes with the child as well. As opposed to most adoptions in which birth and adoption records are sealed by court order, open adoptions allow the parties to decide how much contact the adoptive family and the birthparents will have.

IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES

Differences between spouses that are considered sufficiently severe to make married life together more or less impossible. In a number of states, irreconcilable... (more...)

Differences between spouses that are considered sufficiently severe to make married life together more or less impossible. In a number of states, irreconcilable differences is the accepted ground for a no-fault divorce. As a practical matter, courts seldom, if ever, inquire into what the differences actually are, and routinely grant a divorce as long as the party seeking the divorce says the couple has irreconcilable differences. Compare incompatibility; irremediable breakdown.

NO-FAULT DIVORCE

Any divorce in which the spouse who wants to split up does not have to accuse the other of wrongdoing, but can simply state that the couple no longer gets along... (more...)

Any divorce in which the spouse who wants to split up does not have to accuse the other of wrongdoing, but can simply state that the couple no longer gets along. Until no-fault divorce arrived in the 1970s, the only way a person could get a divorce was to prove that the other spouse was at fault for the marriage not working. No-fault divorces are usually granted for reasons such as incompatibility, irreconcilable differences, or irretrievable or irremediable breakdown of the marriage. Also, some states allow incurable insanity as a basis for a no-fault divorce. Compare fault divorce.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

AccuWeb, Inc. v. Engstrom

... Consequently, they argue that the circuit court and the court of appeals did not err in rejecting the conclusions in the Mesirow Report because, under Wisconsin law, the potential for an injury is not sufficient to support a claim by a plaintiff for damages. ...

MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST BERLIN

... to the May 2002 automobile accident. Â¶ 9 On April 29, 2005, the Milwaukee County Child Support Agency filed four claims against DB's estate for unpaid child support obligations totaling $126,200.28. Â¶ 10 On or about May 24 ...

Christensen v. Sullivan

... In Griffin v. Reeve, 141 Wis.2d 699, 416 NW2d 612 (1987), the court held that contempt was an appropriate remedy for a court to utilize to enforce past due child support payments after the child has reached majority. Id. at 704, 416 NW2d 612. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Babcock Child Support Lawyer, Wisconsin, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

La Chapelle, Kryshak & Nettesheim, LLP

SPONSORED LAWYERS

William R. Wick

Kris Lynn Wright

Roberta J. Walz-O'Leary

Patricia Sommer

Walter W. Stern

Roger A. Rustad

Guy Robert Detlefsen Jr.

Nicholas J. Brazeau

James T. Quinn

Chelsie Ann Thuecks

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

GUARDIAN AD LITEM

INTERLOCUTORY DECREE

SPLIT CUSTODY

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

ACCOMPANYING RELATIVE

VISITATION RIGHTS

OPEN ADOPTION

IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES

NO-FAULT DIVORCE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

AccuWeb, Inc. v. Engstrom

MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST BERLIN

Christensen v. Sullivan

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS