Bellemont Misdemeanor Lawyer, Arizona, page 5

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Zachary Mushkatel
About | Practice Areas
Mushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC
15249 N. 99th Ave Sun City, AZ 85351» view map
Accident & Injury Law
Get Solutions To Your Legal Problems

At Mushkatel, Robbins & Becker, PLLC, our goal is to provide you with a comfortable environment where you can get trusted guidance on the legal matters affecting your life.

800-895-6240
1. Zachary Mushkatel Sun City, AZ
  Attorney at Law - AZ, 2004
  University of Minnesota J.D. 2004
2. AboutMushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC
  Dedicated to Justice!
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Bellemont Misdemeanor lawyer.
Below are all Bellemont Criminal lawyers.

Analese Brighid Dunn

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

110 E Cherry Ave, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Christine M Brown

Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

110 E Cherry Ave, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Linda M Houle

Juvenile Law, Other, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

110 E Cherry Ave, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Kevin M O'Brien

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

110 E Cherry Ave, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Charles William Doughty

Other, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 15 Years

CONTACT

110 E Cherry Ave, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Charles William Doughty

Other, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 15 Years

CONTACT

110 E Cherry Ave, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Christine M Brown

Criminal, Federal Appellate Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

110 E Cherry Ave, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Peter S Balkan

Criminal, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 51 Years

CONTACT

110 E Cherry Ave, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Nicholas B Buzan

Criminal, Juvenile Law, Education, Public Schools

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

110 E Cherry Ave, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Nicholas B Buzan

Juvenile Law, Public Schools, Criminal, Education

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

110 E Cherry Ave, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

ARREST WARRANT

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to ... (more...)

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to the judge or magistrate that convinces her that it is reasonably likely that a crime has taken place and that the person to be named in the warrant is criminally responsible for that crime.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

ARREST

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arre... (more...)

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arrest' even though the police have not announced it; nor are handcuffs or physical restraint necessary. Questioning an arrested person about her involvement in or knowledge of a crime must be preceded by the Miranda warnings if the police intend to use the answers against the person in a criminal case. If the arrested person chooses to remain silent, the questioning must stop.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

INFRACTION

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, ho... (more...)

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, however--refusing to identify oneself when involved in an accident is a misdemeanor in some states.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Fushek v. State

... OPINION. HURWITZ, Justice. Â¶ 1 This case requires us to decide whether the Arizona Constitution guarantees a jury trial to a misdemeanor defendant when the State files a special allegation of sexual motivation pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes ("ARS") Â§ 13-118 (2001). I. ...

State v. Garcia

... OPINION. GEMMILL, Judge. Â¶ 1 The State of Arizona appeals the trial court's designation of defendant Felipe A. Garcia's conviction for disorderly conduct as a class 1 misdemeanor. ... Disorderly conduct under subsection A, paragraph 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 is a class 1 misdemeanor."). ...

State v. Russell

... The trial court correctly held, however, that a felony offense remains a felony unless and until a court designates it a misdemeanor after conviction. ... We disagree. I. A trial court may designate a class 6 felony as a misdemeanor only after conviction of the felony. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Bellemont Misdemeanor Lawyer, Arizona, page 5

Sponsored Law Firm

Mushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Analese Brighid Dunn

Christine M Brown

Linda M Houle

Kevin M O'Brien

Charles William Doughty

Charles William Doughty

Christine M Brown

Peter S Balkan

Nicholas B Buzan

Nicholas B Buzan

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

ARREST WARRANT

PLEA

DIRECTED VERDICT

ARREST

JURY NULLIFICATION

LINEUP

CRIMINAL INSANITY

INFRACTION

NOLO CONTENDERE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Fushek v. State

State v. Garcia

State v. Russell

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS