Chandler Child Support Lawyer, Arizona

Sponsored Law Firm


Scott David Stewart Lawyer

Scott David Stewart

VERIFIED
Divorce & Family Law, Divorce, Child Support, Adoption

Scott Stewart is an experienced and successful divorce lawyer in Phoenix and founder of the Stewart Law Group. Stewart Law Group was started with a si... (more)

Monica H. Donaldson

Adoption, Child Support, Farms, Divorce
Status:  In Good Standing           

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

J. Vincent Gonzalez

Adoption, Child Support, Farms, Divorce
Status:  In Good Standing           

Rachel Winship

Child Support, Criminal, Farms, Divorce
Status:  In Good Standing           

Maria P Stein

Alimony & Spousal Support, Child Support, Adoption, Children's Rights
Status:  In Good Standing           

Shannon S. Bradley

Paternity, Family Law, Divorce, Child Support
Status:  In Good Standing           

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

Carol Carter

Family Law, Child Support, Adoption, Farms
Status:  In Good Standing           

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

Mark A. Werner

Farms, Alimony & Spousal Support, Divorce, Child Support
Status:  In Good Standing           

Annette M. Cox

Family Law, Divorce, Child Support, Divorce & Family Law
Status:  In Good Standing           

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

J Kyle Scoresby

Family Law, Alimony & Spousal Support, Child Support, Adoption
Status:  In Good Standing           

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Chandler Child Support Lawyers and Chandler Child Support Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Divorce & Family Law areas including Adoption, Child Custody, Divorce and Family Law attorneys.

LEGAL TERMS

BEST INTERESTS (OF THE CHILD)

The test that courts use when deciding who will take care of a child. For instance, an adoption is allowed only when a court declares it to be in the best inter... (more...)
The test that courts use when deciding who will take care of a child. For instance, an adoption is allowed only when a court declares it to be in the best interests of the child. Similarly, when asked to decide on custody issues in a divorce case, the judge will base his or her decision on the child's best interests. And the same test is used when judges decide whether a child should be removed from a parent's home because of neglect or abuse. Factors considered by the court in deciding the best interests of a child include: age and sex of the child mental and physical health of the child mental and physical health of the parents lifestyle and other social factors of the parents emotional ties between the parents and the child ability of the parents to provide the child with food, shelter, clothing and medical care established living pattern for the child concerning school, home, community and religious institution quality of schooling, and the child's preference.

DISSOLUTION

A term used instead of divorce in some states.

CONSORTIUM

(1) A group of separate individuals or companies that come together to undertake an enterprise or transaction that is beyond the means of any one member. For ex... (more...)
(1) A group of separate individuals or companies that come together to undertake an enterprise or transaction that is beyond the means of any one member. For example, a group of local businesses may form a consortium to fund and construct a new office complex. (2) The duties and rights associated with marriage. Consortium includes all the tangible and intangible benefits that one spouse derives from the other, including material support, companionship, affection, guidance and sexual relations. The term may arise in a lawsuit if a spouse brings a claim against a third party for 'loss of consortium' after the other spouse is injured or killed.

TENANCY BY THE ENTIRETY

A special kind of property ownership that's only for married couples. Both spouses have the right to enjoy the entire property, and when one spouse dies, the su... (more...)
A special kind of property ownership that's only for married couples. Both spouses have the right to enjoy the entire property, and when one spouse dies, the surviving spouse gets title to the property (called a right of survivorship). It is similar to joint tenancy, but it is available in only about half the states.

MARRIAGE

The legal union of two people. Once a couple is married, their rights and responsibilities toward one another concerning property and support are defined by the... (more...)
The legal union of two people. Once a couple is married, their rights and responsibilities toward one another concerning property and support are defined by the laws of the state in which they live. A marriage can only be terminated by a court granting a divorce or annulment. Compare common law marriage.

PROVOCATION

The act of inciting another person to do a particular thing. In a fault divorce, provocation may constitute a defense to the divorce, preventing it from going t... (more...)
The act of inciting another person to do a particular thing. In a fault divorce, provocation may constitute a defense to the divorce, preventing it from going through. For example, if a wife suing for divorce claims that her husband abandoned her, the husband might defend the suit on the grounds that she provoked the abandonment by driving him out of the house.

IN CAMERA

Latin for 'in chambers.' A legal proceeding is 'in camera' when a hearing is held before the judge in her private chambers or when the public is excluded from t... (more...)
Latin for 'in chambers.' A legal proceeding is 'in camera' when a hearing is held before the judge in her private chambers or when the public is excluded from the courtroom. Proceedings are often held in camera to protect victims and witnesses from public exposure, especially if the victim or witness is a child. There is still, however, a record made of the proceeding, typically by a court stenographer. The judge may decide to seal this record if the material is extremely sensitive or likely to prejudice one side or the other.

DILUTION

A situation in which a famous trademark or service mark is used in a context in which the mark's reputation for quality is tarnished or its distinction is blurr... (more...)
A situation in which a famous trademark or service mark is used in a context in which the mark's reputation for quality is tarnished or its distinction is blurred. In this case, trademark infringement exists even though there is no likelihood of customer confusion, which is usually required in cases of trademark infringement. For example, the use of the word Candyland for a pornographic site on the Internet was ruled to dilute the reputation of the Candyland mark for the well-known children's game, even though the traditional basis for trademark infringement (probable customer confusion) wasn't an issue.

SICK LEAVE

Time off work for illness. Most employers provide for some paid sick leave, although no law requires them to do so. Under the Family and Medical Leave Act, howe... (more...)
Time off work for illness. Most employers provide for some paid sick leave, although no law requires them to do so. Under the Family and Medical Leave Act, however, a worker is guaranteed up to 12 weeks per year of unpaid leave for severe or lasting illnesses.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Simpson v. Simpson

... OPINION. BARKER, Judge. ¶ 1 Appellant Patricia Simpson ("Mother") appeals the family court's decision to not order retroactive child support. ... Child support awards are within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion. ...

Hetherington v. Hetherington

... Husband responds that the Arizona Child Support Guidelines ("Guidelines") [7] do not contemplate imputing the value of employment benefits as income to a parent. He also argues that there was no evidence that he did not pay his mother for rent or the evaluator's fee. ...

Engel v. Landman

... OPINION. SWANN, Judge. [*]. ¶ 1 This is an appeal and cross-appeal from orders modifying the amount of child support Devon Engel ("Father") is to pay Julie Landman ("Mother"). ... 3 Father filed a petition to modify child support in September 2006. ...