Cypress DUI-DWI Lawyer, Texas, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Bryan Fagan
About | Why Choose Us?
Law Office of Bryan Fagan
3707 Cypress Creek Pkwy Suite 400 Houston, TX 77068Â» view map
Divorce, Family Law, Child Custody
AGGRESSIVE & COMPASSIONATE

99% of Bryan's focus is on family law cases, so he can give the attention that others can't. He knows this is a tough time for your family and is committed to protecting your interests.

800-686-9720
1. Bryan Fagan Houston, TX
  Attorney at Law - TX, 2012
  South Texas College of Law, J.D. - 2011
2. AboutMeet Attorney Fagan
  About the Law Office of Bryan Fagan
3. Why Choose Us?Free Consultation
  You will receive individualized attention from a professional attorney.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Tommy L. LaFon

Juvenile Law, Car Accident, Domestic Violence & Neglect, , DUI-DWI

Status:

CONTACT

1244 Heights Boulevard, Houston, TX 77008

Johnny P. Papantonakis

Federal, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

1201 S. Shepherd Drive, Houston, TX 77019

R. Todd Bennett

Federal, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Constitutional Law

Status:

CONTACT

808 Travis Street, Houston, TX 77002

Troy S. Locklear

Products Liability, DUI-DWI, Car Accident, Traffic, Criminal

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

917 Franklin, Houston, TX 77002

Carl A. Moore

Juvenile Law, Administrative Law, Domestic Violence & Neglect, , DUI-DWI

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

2211 Norfolk Street, Houston, TX 77098

Jed Silverman

Internet, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1221 Studewood Street, Houston, TX 77008

Chay Flores Taylor

DUI-DWI, Criminal, Constitutional Law

Status:

CONTACT

808 Travis Street, Houston, TX 77002

Devon Anderson

Computer Law, Criminal, DUI-DWI, Federal

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1401 McKinney Street, Houston, TX 77010

Glenn J. Youngblood

Criminal, , Domestic Violence & Neglect, Federal Appellate Practice, DUI-DWI

Status: Licensed: 52 Years

CONTACT

5555 West Loop S, Bellaire, TX 77401

Robert James Ward

Personal Injury, Administrative Law, DUI-DWI, , Family Law

Status: Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

4313 Ione St, Bellaire, TX 77401

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

BURGLARY

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need no... (more...)

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need not be theft. For instance, someone would be guilty of burglary if he entered a house through an unlocked door in order to commit a murder.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Amador v. State

... We reverse. 874 The Controversy [1]. On June 24, 2003, an assistant district attorney in Montgomery County presented an information in the trial court charging appellant with misdemeanor driving while intoxicated (DWI). The ...

Peavey v. State

... At the penalty stage of the trial, appellant pleaded "true" to the three prior felony convictions alleged for the enhancement of punishment, including: a felony driving while intoxicated (DWI) conviction in 2003 in the same district court; convictions for possession of a controlled ...

Brown v. State

... Brown was placed in custody and charged with DWI-Misdemeanor Repetition. ... 2000). B. Applicable Law. Under Texas law, a person commits DWI "if the person is intoxicated while operating a motor vehicle in a public place." Tex. Penal Code Ann. Â§ 49.04 (Vernon 2008). ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Cypress DUI-DWI Lawyer, Texas, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Bryan Fagan

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Tommy L. LaFon

Johnny P. Papantonakis

R. Todd Bennett

Troy S. Locklear

Carl A. Moore

Jed Silverman

Chay Flores Taylor

Devon Anderson

Glenn J. Youngblood

Robert James Ward

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

HUNG JURY

JURY

SEARCH WARRANT

BURGLARY

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

SPECIFIC INTENT

INTERROGATION

ASSAULT

ACQUITTAL

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Amador v. State

Peavey v. State

Brown v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS