Hughes County, OK Juvenile Law Lawyers

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Monty Pritchett
About | Practice Areas
Pritchett Law Group
126 West Needles Avenue Bixby, OK 74008» view map
Estate Law
A Focus On Results

Don't wait! Contact us for a free phone consultation. Let us help you figure out what your next best steps are

918-509-3891
1. Monty Pritchett Bixby, OK
  Attorney at Law, OK
  University of Oklahoma College of Law, J.D.
2. AboutPritchett Law Group
  A Focus On Results
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Estate Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Hughes Juvenile Law lawyer.
Below are all Hughes lawyers.

Kenneth D. Chesnutt

General Practice

Status: Inactive Licensed: 57 Years

CONTACT

109 E Main St, Holdenville, OK 74848

Robert Leo Irby

Adoption, Contract, Personal Injury, Divorce

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

104 N Broadway, Holdenville, OK 74848

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

In re Amendments to Oklahoma Uniform Jury Instructions for Juvenile Cases

Â¶ 2 It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the proposed amendments to the Oklahoma Uniform Civil Jury Instructions for Juvenile Cases as modified by this Court are adopted, and the Oklahoma Uniform Civil Jury Instructions for Juvenile Cases with the amendments as modified by ...

Jones v. STATE EX REL., OFFICE OF JUVENILE AFFAIRS

Â¶2 The plaintiff/appellant, Mary Roshawn Jones (Jones/employee), was a full-time, classified employee of the defendant/appellee, Oklahoma Office of Juvenile Affairs (OJA/employer), working at the LE Rader Center (Center). On May 3, 2007, Jones was bitten by a spider while at ...

IN RE DISTRICT COURT NUMBERING SYSTEM

... NOT VOTING: HARGRAVE, OPALA, JJ. Exhibit "A". Index I. Civil Proceedings II. Criminal Proceedings III. Family and Domestic Proceedings IV. Juvenile Proceedings V. Licenses VI. Miscellaneous Filings VII. Probate and Trust Proceedings ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended