Garrettsville Criminal Lawyer, Ohio, page 4

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Michael Washington
About | Practice Areas
Washington Law, LLC
P.O. Box 944 Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44223» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Experience Makes the Difference

We take the time to research your situation completely and bring about the most effective opportunities ensuring you get the successful outcome you deserve.

800-851-6480
1. Michael Washington Cuyahoga Falls, OH
  Attorney at Law - OH, 2001
2. AboutWashington Law, LLC
  Experience You Can Trust
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Victor V. Vigluicci

Government, Criminal, Religious Discrimination, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

241 S Chestnut St, Ravenna, OH 44266

Terry Franklin Ivanchak

Family Law, Criminal, Bankruptcy, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

141 South St Se, Warren, OH 44482

Carly Laura Pisani

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

16740 Park Circle Dr, Chagrin Falls, OH 44023

Jodi Lynn Wood

Workers' Compensation, Personal Injury, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

9294 State Route 43, Streetsboro, OH 44241

Errol Anthony Can

Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

11 S River St, Kent, OH 44240

Jamison Andrew Offineer

Estate Planning, Estate, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

164 E Main St., Kent, OH 44240

Michael Alan Partlow

Social Security, Family Law, Criminal, Property Damage

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

112 South Water Street, Kent, OH 44240

Eric Ross Fink

Government, Family Law, Criminal, Collection

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

11 South River Street, Kent, OH 44240

Kurt David Latell

Traffic, Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

724 Youngstown Road, Niles, OH 44446

William Allen Lefaiver

International Other, Government, Criminal, Religious Discrimination

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 56 Years

CONTACT

8010 Mcghee Lane, Hudson, OH 44236

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

VENIREMEN

People who are summoned to the courthouse so that they may be questioned and perhaps chosen as jurors in trials of civil or criminal cases.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

DISTRICT ATTORNEY (D.A.)

A lawyer who is elected to represent a state government in criminal cases in a designated county or judicial district. A D.A.'s duties typically include reviewi... (more...)

A lawyer who is elected to represent a state government in criminal cases in a designated county or judicial district. A D.A.'s duties typically include reviewing police arrest reports, deciding whether to bring criminal charges against arrested people and prosecuting criminal cases in court. The D.A. may also supervise other attorneys, called Deputy District Attorneys or Assistant District Attorneys. In some states a District Attorney may be called a Prosecuting Attorney, County Attorney or State's Attorney. In the federal system, the equivalent to the D.A. is a United States Attorney. The country has many U.S. Attorneys, each appointed by the President, who supervise regional offices staffed with prosecutors called Assistant United States Attorneys.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Singleton

... Court of Ohio. However, for criminal sentences imposed on and after July 11, 2006, in which a trial court failed to properly impose postrelease control, trial courts shall apply the procedures set forth in RC 2929.191. {Â¶ 2} In this ...

State v. Colon

... Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Cullen Sweeney, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Jason A. Macke, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. MOYER, CJ. ...

State v. Baker

... We have previously determined that "in order to decide whether an order issued by a trial court in a criminal proceeding is a reviewable final order, appellate courts should apply the definitions of `final order' contained in RC 2505.02." State v. Muncie (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 440 ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Garrettsville Criminal Lawyer, Ohio, page 4

Sponsored Law Firm

Washington Law, LLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Victor V. Vigluicci

Terry Franklin Ivanchak

Carly Laura Pisani

Jodi Lynn Wood

Errol Anthony Can

Jamison Andrew Offineer

Michael Alan Partlow

Eric Ross Fink

Kurt David Latell

William Allen Lefaiver

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

VENIREMEN

JURY NULLIFICATION

DISTRICT ATTORNEY (D.A.)

MOTION IN LIMINE

NOLLE PROSEQUI

DIRECTED VERDICT

MENS REA

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Singleton

State v. Colon

State v. Baker

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS