Mokane RICO Act Lawyer, Missouri

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jason Shackelford
About | Practice Areas
Law Office Of Jason Shackelford, P.C.
929 MO-22 P.O. Box 142 Centralia, MO 65240» view map
Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law
The Highest Quality Of Service

We strive to educate our clients and inform them of their options so we can get them the best results. We are committed to providing the highest quality of service.

800-971-5130
1. Jason Shackelford Centralia, MO
  Attorney at Law - MO, 2001
  Regent University J.D. 2000
2. AboutLaw Office Of Jason Shackelford, P.C.
  The Highest Quality Of Service
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Mokane RICO Act lawyer.
Below are all Mokane Criminal lawyers.

Jason H. Ludwig

Motor Vehicle, Family Law, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status:

CONTACT

515 East High Street, Jefferson City, MO 65101

Thomas M. Dunlap

Estate Administration, Estate Planning, Family Law, Criminal

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

13 East Fifth Street, Fulton, MO 65251

Sue Crane

Bankruptcy, Criminal, Family Law

Status:

CONTACT

411 Court St, Fulton, MO 65251

William Derek Hux

White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Personal Injury, Personal Injury

Status:

CONTACT

401 Court Street, Fulton, MO 65251

Michael A. Dallmeyer

Wills & Probate, Divorce, Juvenile Law, Bankruptcy

Status: Licensed: 15 Years

CONTACT

419 E High St, Jefferson City, MO 65101

Chlora Aryvonne Lindley-Myers

Administrative Law, Civil Rights, Corporate, Criminal, Health Care

Status: Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

301 W High St, Jefferson City, MO 65101

Joseph Gabriel Plaggenberg

Administrative Law, Estate Planning, Juvenile Law, Power of Attorney

Status: Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

1528 E Mccarty St, Jefferson City, MO 65101

Anjali Gandhi

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

311 East High Street, Jefferson City, MO 65101

Kimberly Renee Kollmeyer

Commercial Real Estate, Traffic, Family Law, DUI-DWI

Status:

CONTACT

Jefferson City, MO 65110

Thomas Robbins Thomas Robbins

DUI-DWI, State Appellate Practice, Criminal, Administrative Law

Status:

CONTACT

300B E. High Street, Jefferson City, MO 65101

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

CONTINGENCY FEE

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obt... (more...)

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obtains after settling or winning the case. Often contingency fee agreements -- which are most commonly used in personal injury cases -- award the successful lawyer between 20% and 50% of the amount recovered. Lawyers representing defendants charged with crimes may not charge contingency fees. In most states, contingency fee agreements must be in writing.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

ARREST

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arre... (more...)

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arrest' even though the police have not announced it; nor are handcuffs or physical restraint necessary. Questioning an arrested person about her involvement in or knowledge of a crime must be preceded by the Miranda warnings if the police intend to use the answers against the person in a criminal case. If the arrested person chooses to remain silent, the questioning must stop.

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Mokane RICO Act Lawyer, Missouri

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office Of Jason Shackelford, P.C.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Jason H. Ludwig

Thomas M. Dunlap

Sue Crane

William Derek Hux

Michael A. Dallmeyer

Chlora Aryvonne Lindley-Myers

Joseph Gabriel Plaggenberg

Anjali Gandhi

Kimberly Renee Kollmeyer

Thomas Robbins Thomas Robbins

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MENS REA

CONTINGENCY FEE

CAPITAL CASE

GRAND JURY

JURY

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

ARREST

ARRAIGNMENT

SPECIFIC INTENT

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS