Oracle DUI-DWI Lawyer, Arizona

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Zachary Mushkatel
About | Practice Areas
Mushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC
15249 N. 99th Ave Sun City, AZ 85351» view map
Accident & Injury Law
Get Solutions To Your Legal Problems

At Mushkatel, Robbins & Becker, PLLC, our goal is to provide you with a comfortable environment where you can get trusted guidance on the legal matters affecting your life.

800-895-6240
1. Zachary Mushkatel Sun City, AZ
  Attorney at Law - AZ, 2004
  University of Minnesota J.D. 2004
2. AboutMushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC
  Dedicated to Justice!
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Natasha Wrae

✓

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

Aggressive Criminal Defense

Natasha Wrae is an aggressive criminal defense attorney since 1999, that has defended individuals all over Arizona against misdemeanor and felony char... (more)

CONTACT

800-662-6941

312 S 3rd Ave, Tucson, AZ 85701

Stuart de Haan

Traffic, Child Custody, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

100 N Stone, Tucson, AZ 85701

Stephen M. Trezza

Litigation, DUI-DWI, Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy & Debt

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

4011 E. Broadway Boulevard, Tucson, AZ 85711

Matthew H. Green

Deportation, Federal, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

130 W. Cushing Street, Tucson, AZ 85701

Stephen Paul Barnard

Grand Jury Proceedings, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

945 N. Stone Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85705

Cody Nicoll Weagant

Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Wrongful Death

Status: Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

Florence, AZ 85132

Mariam Ferguson

DUI-DWI, Household Mold, Collection, Domestic Violence & Neglect

Status: Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

100 N Stone Ave, Tucson, AZ 85701

James Nesci

Traffic, Transportation & Shipping, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

216 N Main Ave, Tucson, AZ 85701

Mark E. Evans

International Other, Divorce, DUI-DWI, Car Accident, Family Law

Status:

CONTACT

177 N Church Ave, Tucson, AZ 85701

Jeffrey D Bartolino

Other, Federal Appellate Practice, Juvenile Law, Criminal, DUI-DWI

Status: Licensed: 52 Years

CONTACT

271 N Stone Ave, Tucson, AZ 85701

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to perm... (more...)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. Each of those four parts is an element that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

BAIL

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all requi... (more...)

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all required court appearances. The amount of bail is determined by the local bail schedule, which is based on the seriousness of the offense. The judge can increase the bail if the prosecutor convinces him that the defendant is likely to flee (for example, if he has failed to show up in court in the past), or he can decrease it if the defense attorney shows that the defendant is unlikely to run (for example, he has strong ties to the community by way of a steady job and a family).

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

JUSTICE SYSTEM

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal... (more...)

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal prosecutors and public defenders. Many people caught up in this system refer to it by less flattering names.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Noceo

... 1 In the summer of 2007, appellee Edward Noceo and petitioner Michael Harris were separately arrested and charged with driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI). ... 4 After being arrested for DUI in August 2007, Noceo consented to a blood draw at the scene. ...

State v. Miller

... The state asserts the RAJI instruction misstates the law by adding an element to the crime of driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI). ... 285, Â¶ 2, 34 P.3d 394, 395 (App.2001) (granting special action jurisdiction to address state's objection to jury instructions in DUI case). ...

Potter v. Vanderpool

... Justice Court. Petitioner Carol Ann Potter was cited for driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI), driving with an alcohol concentration (AC) of .08 or more, 1259 and driving with an AC of .15 or more (extreme DUI). Potter's ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Oracle DUI-DWI Lawyer, Arizona

Sponsored Law Firm

Mushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Natasha Wrae

Stuart de Haan

Stephen M. Trezza

Matthew H. Green

Stephen Paul Barnard

Cody Nicoll Weagant

Mariam Ferguson

James Nesci

Mark E. Evans

Jeffrey D Bartolino

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

JURY NULLIFICATION

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

BAIL

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

JUSTICE SYSTEM

ACCOMPLICE

MOTION IN LIMINE

GRAND JURY

INFORMED CONSENT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Noceo

State v. Miller

Potter v. Vanderpool

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS