Tioga County, PA DUI-DWI Lawyers, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Mark Guralnick
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick
55 Madison Avenue 4th Floor Morristown, NJ 07960Â» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Dedicated. Fearless. Successful.

Mark S. Guralnick and his legal team have helped clients throughout the USA and across the world by applying unparalleled dedication and hard work to each case.

800-399-8371
1. Mark Guralnick Morristown, NJ
  Attorney at Law - NJ, 1984
  Shepard Broad Law Center J.D.1984
2. AboutLaw Office of Mark S. Guralnick
  Our firm assists clients in a wide variety of legal challenges.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Tioga DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Tioga lawyers.

Edward Howland Owlett

Real Estate, Estate, Civil & Human Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

10469 Route 6, Wellsboro, PA 16901

Sandra Kay Olson

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

275 Blake Rd, Blossburg, PA 16912

William A. Hebe

Estate, Child Custody

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 52 Years

CONTACT

17 Central Ave, Wellsboro, PA 16901

William Richard Stokes

Real Estate, Lawsuit & Dispute, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

19 Central Avenue, Wellsboro, PA 16901

Lawrence Bruce Mansfield

Real Estate, Government, Divorce & Family Law, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

9 E Main Street, Mansfield, PA 16933

Stephen J. Banik

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

Wellsboro, PA 16901

James Thomas Rague

Landlord-Tenant, Child Custody, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

17 Central Ave, Wellsboro, PA 16901

Christopher R Lantz

Real Estate, Estate, Employment

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

19 Central Avenue, Wellsboro, PA 16901

R. Lowell Coolidge

Estate

Status: Deceased Licensed: 55 Years

CONTACT

Wellsboro, PA 16901

Tiffany L Cummings

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

Mansfield, PA 16933

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

BOOKING

A quaint phrase that refers to the recording of an arrested person's name, age, address and reason for arrest when that person is brought to jail and placed beh... (more...)

A quaint phrase that refers to the recording of an arrested person's name, age, address and reason for arrest when that person is brought to jail and placed behind bars. Nowadays, the book is likely to be a computer. Usually, a mug shot and fingerprints are taken, and the arrestee's clothing and personal effects are inventoried and stored.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

PUBLIC DEFENDER

A lawyer appointed by the court and paid by the county, state, or federal government to represent clients who are charged with violations of criminal law and ar... (more...)

A lawyer appointed by the court and paid by the county, state, or federal government to represent clients who are charged with violations of criminal law and are unable to pay for their own defense.

VENIREMEN

People who are summoned to the courthouse so that they may be questioned and perhaps chosen as jurors in trials of civil or criminal cases.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Com. v. Haag

... In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether two offenses of Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol ("DUI") occurring within one and one-half hours of each other should be considered first and second offenses for purposes of sentencing under the recidivist provisions of ...

Glidden v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

... County (trial court) that denied his statutory appeal from a one-year suspension of his operating privileges for a violation of Section 3802(a)(1) of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa.CS Â§ 3802(a)(1) (driving under the influence of alcohol or controlled substance (DUI), general impairment). ...

Reinhart v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

... suspended Licensee's operating privileges because of three criminal convictions arising from a single accident: reckless driving; failing to stop his vehicle at an accident scene where 168 death or personal injury was involved; and driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI). ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Tioga County, PA DUI-DWI Lawyers, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Edward Howland Owlett

Sandra Kay Olson

William A. Hebe

William Richard Stokes

Lawrence Bruce Mansfield

Stephen J. Banik

James Thomas Rague

Christopher R Lantz

R. Lowell Coolidge

Tiffany L Cummings

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

BOOKING

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

ACQUITTAL

PUBLIC DEFENDER

VENIREMEN

SELF-INCRIMINATION

PLEA

BURDEN OF PROOF

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Com. v. Haag

Glidden v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

Reinhart v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 70

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details