Altonah Criminal Lawyer, Utah

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

William Melton
About | Practice Areas
Melton Law
5955 South Redwood Road Suite 103 Taylorsville, UT 84123» view map
Criminal Defense and Accident & Injury
Legal Expertise You Can Rely On

Melton Law is dedicated to providing competent and great representation to our clients. We will be there to help you and answer any questions you have every step of the way.

800-952-9770
1. William Melton Taylorsville, UT
  Attorney at Law- UT, 2019
  University of Idaho College of Law, J.D. 2019
2. AboutMelton Law
  Legal Expertise You Can Rely On
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Altonah Criminal lawyer.
Below are all Altonah lawyers.

Roland F Uresk

Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

47 North 200 East, Roosevelt, UT 84066

Ron Smith

Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

Fruitland, UT 84027

Hailey Shaul

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Altamont, UT 84001

Michael Kent Goodrich

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

21554 W 9000 S, Duchesne, UT 84021

Tyler C Allred

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

734 North Center Street, Duchesne, UT 84021

Clay Warren Crozier

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

657 E Main Street, Duchesne, UT 84021

Jennifer K Gowans

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

1952 N Leftys Lane, Kamas, UT 84036

Jonathan S. Gunn

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

11885 N. Star Gazer Circle, Kamas, UT 84036

Linzi Jia-Dwan Labrum-Garner

Environmental Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

532 Mason Circle, Roosevelt, UT 84066

Keith E Eddington

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

1040 West 190 South, Roosevelt, UT 84066

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

CONTINGENCY FEE

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obt... (more...)

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obtains after settling or winning the case. Often contingency fee agreements -- which are most commonly used in personal injury cases -- award the successful lawyer between 20% and 50% of the amount recovered. Lawyers representing defendants charged with crimes may not charge contingency fees. In most states, contingency fee agreements must be in writing.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

BURGLARY

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need no... (more...)

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need not be theft. For instance, someone would be guilty of burglary if he entered a house through an unlocked door in order to commit a murder.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

CRIMINAL LAW

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not p... (more...)

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not punishable by imprisonment. In order to be found guilty of a criminal law, the prosecution must show that the defendant intended to act as he did; in civil law, you may sometimes be responsible for your actions even though you did not intend the consequences. For example, civil law makes you financially responsible for a car accident you caused but didn't intend.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Salt Lake City v. Bench

... 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)). It is initially justified if a police officer has a reasonable suspicion, prior to the stop, that a person is engaging in, or has engaged in, criminal behavior. See id.; Utah Code Ann. ... 2. Details About the Observed Criminal Conduct. ...

State v. Lane

... 4 On July 15, 2005, criminal charges were filed against Lane, including two counts of negligent homicide, a class A misdemeanor. ... 16 A victim is not a party to a criminal case and is not afforded the right to appeal the dismissal of a criminal judgment. ...

State v. Valdez

... BILLINGS, Judge: Â¶ 1 Defendant Patrick Henry Valdez was charged in five different informations based on separate criminal episodes with two second degree felonies, four third degree felonies, and seven misdemeanors, primarily related to various burglaries. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Altonah Criminal Lawyer, Utah

Sponsored Law Firm

Melton Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Roland F Uresk

Ron Smith

Hailey Shaul

Michael Kent Goodrich

Tyler C Allred

Clay Warren Crozier

Jennifer K Gowans

Jonathan S. Gunn

Linzi Jia-Dwan Labrum-Garner

Keith E Eddington

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

FEDERAL COURT

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

CONTINGENCY FEE

JURY

BURGLARY

DIRECTED VERDICT

PLEA

INTENTIONAL TORT

CRIMINAL LAW

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Salt Lake City v. Bench

State v. Lane

State v. Valdez

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details