Bellemont Misdemeanor Lawyer, Arizona, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Zachary Mushkatel
About | Practice Areas
Mushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC
15249 N. 99th Ave Sun City, AZ 85351» view map
Accident & Injury Law
Get Solutions To Your Legal Problems

At Mushkatel, Robbins & Becker, PLLC, our goal is to provide you with a comfortable environment where you can get trusted guidance on the legal matters affecting your life.

800-895-6240
1. Zachary Mushkatel Sun City, AZ
  Attorney at Law - AZ, 2004
  University of Minnesota J.D. 2004
2. AboutMushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC
  Dedicated to Justice!
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Bellemont Misdemeanor lawyer.
Below are all Bellemont Criminal lawyers.

Diane Sue McCoy

Family Law, Traffic, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

1300 W University Avenue, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Diane Sue McCoy

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

1300 W University Avenue, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Diane S McCoy

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

1300 W University Avenue, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Diane S Mccoy

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

1300 W University Avenue, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Shannon Clark

Civil Rights, Personal Injury, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal, Mass Torts

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

1725 N Kutch, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Steven L Harvey

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

324 W Birch Ave, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Steven L Harvey

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

324 W Birch Ave, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Steven Leo Harvey

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

324 W Birch Ave, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

John L Rodabaugh

Traffic, Federal Appellate Practice, Municipal, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

211 W Aspen Ave, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Marianne Eccleston Sullivan

Litigation, State Government, Criminal, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

211 W Aspen Ave, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to perm... (more...)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. Each of those four parts is an element that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

CRIMINAL LAW

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not p... (more...)

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not punishable by imprisonment. In order to be found guilty of a criminal law, the prosecution must show that the defendant intended to act as he did; in civil law, you may sometimes be responsible for your actions even though you did not intend the consequences. For example, civil law makes you financially responsible for a car accident you caused but didn't intend.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Fushek v. State

... OPINION. HURWITZ, Justice. Â¶ 1 This case requires us to decide whether the Arizona Constitution guarantees a jury trial to a misdemeanor defendant when the State files a special allegation of sexual motivation pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes ("ARS") Â§ 13-118 (2001). I. ...

State v. Garcia

... OPINION. GEMMILL, Judge. Â¶ 1 The State of Arizona appeals the trial court's designation of defendant Felipe A. Garcia's conviction for disorderly conduct as a class 1 misdemeanor. ... Disorderly conduct under subsection A, paragraph 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 is a class 1 misdemeanor."). ...

State v. Russell

... The trial court correctly held, however, that a felony offense remains a felony unless and until a court designates it a misdemeanor after conviction. ... We disagree. I. A trial court may designate a class 6 felony as a misdemeanor only after conviction of the felony. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Bellemont Misdemeanor Lawyer, Arizona, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

Mushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Diane Sue McCoy

Diane Sue McCoy

Diane S McCoy

Diane S Mccoy

Shannon Clark

Steven L Harvey

Steven L Harvey

Steven Leo Harvey

John L Rodabaugh

Marianne Eccleston Sullivan

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

SPECIFIC INTENT

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

CRIMINAL LAW

ACCOMPLICE

HABEAS CORPUS

CONVICTION

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

HUNG JURY

EAVESDROPPING

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Fushek v. State

State v. Garcia

State v. Russell

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS