Brookfield White Collar Crime Lawyer, New York

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Mark Guralnick
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick
55 Madison Avenue 4th Floor Morristown, NJ 07960Â» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Dedicated. Fearless. Successful.

Mark S. Guralnick and his legal team have helped clients throughout the USA and across the world by applying unparalleled dedication and hard work to each case.

800-399-8371
1. Mark Guralnick Morristown, NJ
  Attorney at Law - NJ, 1984
  Shepard Broad Law Center J.D.1984
2. AboutLaw Office of Mark S. Guralnick
  Our firm assists clients in a wide variety of legal challenges.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Brookfield White Collar Crime lawyer.
Below are all Brookfield Criminal lawyers.

Eva Brindisi Pearlman

Criminal, Bad Faith Insurance, Defamation & Slander, Animal Bite

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

2713 Genesee Street, Utica, NY 13501

Mark Ottavio Chieco

Social Security -- Disability, Felony, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

610 Charlotte St, Utica, NY 13501

Christopher Jude Pelli

Traffic, Criminal, Personal Injury, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

3 Derbyshire Place, Utica, NY 13501

Paul Harry Hadley

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

3156 Gorton Lake Rd, Waterville, NY 13480

Paul H. Hadley

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

3156 Gorton Lake Rd, Waterville, NY 13480

Paul M. Gallagher

Landlord-Tenant, Litigation, Child Custody, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

7723 State Route 20, Waterville, NY 13480

Jack Gibbons

Traffic, Welfare, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Edmeston, NY 13335

William John Gibbons

Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal, Civil & Human Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 52 Years

CONTACT

36 North Street, Edmeston, NY 13335

Thomas Bartley Luka

Motor Vehicle, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

59 Hamilton St, Hamilton, NY 13346

Victoria Quesada

Estate, Wrongful Termination, Criminal, Defamation & Slander

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

35 University Ave, Hamilton, NY 13346

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, th... (more...)

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, the crime of aggravated assault is a physical attack made worse because it is committed with a dangerous weapon, results in severe bodily injury or is made in conjunction with another serious crime. Aggravated assault is usually considered a felony, punishable by a prison sentence.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

ARREST WARRANT

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to ... (more...)

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to the judge or magistrate that convinces her that it is reasonably likely that a crime has taken place and that the person to be named in the warrant is criminally responsible for that crime.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

Brookfield White Collar Crime Lawyer, New York

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Eva Brindisi Pearlman

Mark Ottavio Chieco

Christopher Jude Pelli

Paul Harry Hadley

Paul H. Hadley

Paul M. Gallagher

Jack Gibbons

William John Gibbons

Thomas Bartley Luka

Victoria Quesada

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

JURY

ARREST WARRANT

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

BURDEN OF PROOF

SPECIFIC INTENT

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

CONVICTION

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details