Carolina Criminal Lawyer, Rhode Island

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Joseph Botelho
About | Practice Areas
Botelho Law Group
901 Eastern Ave Suite 2 Fall River, MA 02723» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Fall River Lawyers

At the Botelho Law Group we have several attorneys, with different specializations; to help your case’s individual needs.

800-229-5331
1. Joseph Botelho Fall River, MA
  Attorney at Law- MA, 2000
  University of Massachusetts School of Law, J.D. 2000
2. AboutBotelho Law Group
  Fall River Lawyers
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Bankruptcy & Debt Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Jeffrey C. Blake

Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal, Business, Bankruptcy & Debt

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Carolina, RI 02898

Joseph H. Scott

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Estate, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

25 Pinehust Drive, Carolina, RI 02812

Michael D. Digioia

Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1000 Usquepaugh Road, West Kingston, RI 02892

Valerie S. Carter

Real Estate, Government, Criminal, Civil & Human Rights

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

16B Wheeler Lane, Carolina, RI 02832

D. Peter Desimone

Traffic, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

18 Wooded Grove Circle, West Kingston, RI 02892

Kimberly Elizabeth Rauch

Lawsuit & Dispute, Immigration, Government, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

250 Fenner Hill Road, Carolina, RI 02832

Chelsea Greene

Immigration, Child Custody, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

9 Morning Road, West Kingston, RI 02892

Mark T. Boivin

Landlord-Tenant, Timeshare, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

40 South Arnolda Rd, Charlestown, RI 02813

Albert Louis Evans

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

3 Wingate Road, Wakefield, RI 02879

Miriam Feuer Schwartz

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

953 Kingstown Rd, Wakefield, RI 02879

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PROSECUTOR

A lawyer who works for the local, state or federal government to bring and litigate criminal cases.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, th... (more...)

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, the crime of aggravated assault is a physical attack made worse because it is committed with a dangerous weapon, results in severe bodily injury or is made in conjunction with another serious crime. Aggravated assault is usually considered a felony, punishable by a prison sentence.

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Bouffard

... The burden of proof on the state is much lower than that which exists in a criminal trial â€” the state need only show that "reasonably satisfactory" evidence supports a finding that the defendant has violated his or her probation. ...

Rodrigues v. State

... She subsequently was charged by criminal information with delivery of both heroin and cocaine, as well as two counts of conspiracy to violate the Uniformed Controlled Substances Act, GL1956 chapter 28 of title 21, by delivering heroin and cocaine. ...

State v. Espinal

... Mr. Marine testified that, subsequent to the meeting with defendant, he filed a victim impact statement with the Attorney General's office, in which he stated that he would be amenable to an amendment of the criminal charge to that of disorderly conduct. ...

Carolina Criminal Lawyer, Rhode Island

Sponsored Law Firm

Botelho Law Group

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Jeffrey C. Blake

Joseph H. Scott

Michael D. Digioia

Valerie S. Carter

D. Peter Desimone

Kimberly Elizabeth Rauch

Chelsea Greene

Mark T. Boivin

Albert Louis Evans

Miriam Feuer Schwartz

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PROSECUTOR

SELF-DEFENSE

BURDEN OF PROOF

MCNAGHTEN RULE

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

CIVIL

CHARGE

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

LARCENY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Bouffard

Rodrigues v. State

State v. Espinal

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details