Clackamas Criminal Lawyer, Oregon

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Gregory Oliveros
About | Practice Areas
Oliveros Law Group, P.C.
9200 S.E. Sunnybrook Boulevard Suite 335 Clackamas, OR 97015» view map
Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law
007 Law

At Oliveros Law Group P.C, our attorneys help clients understand their rights when they have been injured due to the deliberate or careless act of another person.

800-797-7891
1. Gregory Oliveros Clackamas, OR
  Attorney at Law - OR, 1990
  Lewis & Clark Law School J.D. 1990
2. AboutOliveros Law Group, P.C.
  007 Law
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Gregory P. Oliveros

✓ VERIFIED

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Gregory Paul Oliveros was born and raised in the Portland area. After graduating from the Oregon College of Education in 1973, he taught in the Portla... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-797-7891

9200 S.E. Sunnybrook Boulevard, Clackamas, OR 97015

Mark R. Bailey

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

294 Warner Milne Road, Oregon City, OR 97045

Robert L. Sepp

Employment, Labor Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2350 Willamette Falls Drive, West Linn, OR 97068

H Scott Raivio

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

741 S.W. Lincoln Street, Portland, OR 97201

Priscilla L. Seaborg

US Courts, Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1906 S.W. Madison St., Portland, OR 97205

Randall Vogt

Sexual Harassment, Sexual Harassment, Criminal, Civil & Human Rights, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1314 NW Irving Street, Portland, OR 97209

James W Walker

Lawsuit & Dispute, Federal, Government, Criminal, Products Liability

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 51 Years

CONTACT

10365 Se Sunnyside Rd, Boring, OR 97015

Andrew Soles

Criminal

Status: Inactive Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

10365 SE Sunnyside Rd, Boring, OR 97015

Barry Wayne Engle

Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

12901 Se 97Th Ave, Boring, OR 97015

Mark C Cogan

Traffic, White Collar Crime, Constitutional Law, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

1500 Sw 1St Ave, Happy Valley, OR 97201

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Rodriguez/Buck

... [9]. 3. Criminal History and Recidivism. A third factor that this court often has considered in proportionality cases is the defendant's criminal history. ... It is another indication that Measure 11 sentences in these cases would be disproportionate to the offense. 3. Criminal History. ...

State v. Rodgers

... stop was unlawfully extended when Van Arsdall had everything he needed to issue a citation for the burned-out license plate light and, instead of doing so, questioned defendant about the containers without reasonable suspicion that defendant had engaged in criminal activity. ...

State v. Lennon

... Based on the seriousness of his current offense and the existence of two person-related felony convictions in his criminal history, the presumptive sentence for defendant's offense under the sentencing guidelines was 35 to 40 months of incarceration. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Clackamas Criminal Lawyer, Oregon

Sponsored Law Firm

Oliveros Law Group, P.C.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Gregory P. Oliveros

Mark R. Bailey

Robert L. Sepp

H Scott Raivio

Priscilla L. Seaborg

Randall Vogt

James W Walker

Andrew Soles

Barry Wayne Engle

Mark C Cogan

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

SEARCH WARRANT

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

GRAND JURY

IMPEACH

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

SPECIFIC INTENT

EAVESDROPPING

INFORMED CONSENT

SELF-INCRIMINATION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Rodriguez/Buck

State v. Rodgers

State v. Lennon

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details