Cleveland Criminal Lawyer, Georgia

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Ronald Baker
About | Practice Areas
Ronald Baker Attorney at Law
11877 Douglas Rd Suite 102191 Johns Creek, GA 30005» view map
Intellectual Property Law
Working Relentlessly For You

Ronald Baker is a practicing lawyer in Georgia who handles cases involving Intellectual Property Law.

800-597-8640
1. Ronald Baker Johns Creek, GA
  Attorney at Law- GA
  Walter F. George School of Law, J.D.
2. AboutRonald Baker Attorney at Law
  Working Relentlessly For You
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Intellectual Property Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Jerry F. Lee

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

190 Whisperwood Way, Cleveland, GA 30528

Emily Ann Carr

Family Law, Criminal, Personal Injury, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Cleveland, GA 30528

Christopher Allen Jones

Estate, Family Law, DUI-DWI, Credit & Debt

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

Cleveland, GA 30528

Todd Lewis Lord

Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), Misdemeanor, Criminal, Civil & Human Rights, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

4 Courthouse Square, Cleveland, GA 30528

Gregory A. Futch

Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 41 Years

CONTACT

59 Main Street, Cleveland, GA 30528

Stanley R. Lawson

Child Custody, Criminal, Animal Bite

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

Cleveland, GA 30528

Penny Sueann Hunter

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

59 S Main Street, Cleveland, GA 30528

David Adam Dziejowski

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

508 Paradise Valley Rd, Cleveland, GA 30528

John Raymond Deacon

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

70 Timberlake Drive, Cleveland, GA 30528

Charles B. Brown

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

Helen, GA 30545

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

IMPRISON

To put a person in prison or jail or otherwise confine him as punishment for committing a crime.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

ARREST

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arre... (more...)

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arrest' even though the police have not announced it; nor are handcuffs or physical restraint necessary. Questioning an arrested person about her involvement in or knowledge of a crime must be preceded by the Miranda warnings if the police intend to use the answers against the person in a criminal case. If the arrested person chooses to remain silent, the questioning must stop.

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Ruffin v. State

... [3] Thus, the Sixth Amendment of the Bill of Rights guarantees that "[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy . . . trial." [4] The Civil War Amendments made the Sixth Amendment speedy trial right enforceable in state criminal prosecutions. ...

Rodriguez v. State

... The indictment charged that both Appellants "did participate in criminal street gang activity by committing a crime of violence, to wit: aggravated assault while associated with a criminal street gang. . . ." A separate count charged ...

English v. State

... Atty., for Appellee. PHIPPS, Judge. Following a jury trial, Jason English was convicted of, among other offenses, criminal attempt to commit aggravated sodomy. He contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the criminal attempt conviction. We disagree and affirm. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Cleveland Criminal Lawyer, Georgia

Sponsored Law Firm

Ronald Baker Attorney at Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Jerry F. Lee

Emily Ann Carr

Christopher Allen Jones

Todd Lewis Lord

Gregory A. Futch

Stanley R. Lawson

Penny Sueann Hunter

David Adam Dziejowski

John Raymond Deacon

Charles B. Brown

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INTERROGATION

IMPRISON

SPECIFIC INTENT

MCNAGHTEN RULE

ARREST

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

PLEA

MENS REA

SELF-INCRIMINATION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Ruffin v. State

Rodriguez v. State

English v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details