Dawn Juvenile Law Lawyer, Texas

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Robert Jones
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Robert R. Jones III
2411 Emancipation Ave, Suite 202, Houston, TX 77004Â» view map
Criminal Defense
Expert Representation for Reasonable Rates

If you need representation, call me 24/7.

800-883-8760
1. Robert Jones San Antonio, TX
  Attorney at Law - TX, 2014
  South Texas College of Law J.D. 2011
2. AboutLaw Office of Robert R. Jones III
  Call me 24/7--Reasonable Rates
3. Practice AreasSpecializations
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
7. Profile

Lacy Elise Miller

Juvenile Law, Other, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

2309 Russell Long Blvd, Canyon, TX 79015

Courtney Nicole Wiggins

Juvenile Law, Other, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

2309 Russell Long Blvd, Canyon, TX 79015

Maurita Erin Mulanax

Juvenile Law, Immigration, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

7420 Golden Pond Pl, Amarillo, TX 79121

Jacob David Schmidt

Juvenile Law, Other, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

7480 Golden Pond Pl, Amarillo, TX 79121

Jacob D. Schmidt

Juvenile Law, Other, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

7480 Golden Pond Pl, Amarillo, TX 79121

Greta Rapstine Crofford

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

3601 S Georgia St, Amarillo, TX 79109

Robyn Nicole Nance

Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2403 Line Ave, Amarillo, TX 79106

James Clark

Bankruptcy, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Wills

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 51 Years

CONTACT

1900 Sw 6Th Ave, Amarillo, TX 79106

Quenton Todd Hatter

Juvenile Law, Wills, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

821 Sw 9Th Ave, Amarillo, TX 79101

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

VENIREMEN

People who are summoned to the courthouse so that they may be questioned and perhaps chosen as jurors in trials of civil or criminal cases.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

ARREST

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arre... (more...)

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arrest' even though the police have not announced it; nor are handcuffs or physical restraint necessary. Questioning an arrested person about her involvement in or knowledge of a crime must be preceded by the Miranda warnings if the police intend to use the answers against the person in a criminal case. If the arrested person chooses to remain silent, the questioning must stop.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Meadoux v. State

... [2]. On direct appeal, Meadoux argued, for the first time, that the prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments contained in the Eighth Amendment barred the State from subjecting a juvenile capital offender to imprisonment for life without parole. ...

In re Hall

... In this original mandamus proceeding, we must decide whether an indigent person, adjudicated a juvenile delinquent as a minor and sentenced to forty years, has a 926 statutory right under the Juvenile Justice Code to the appointment of an attorney in a habeas corpus ...

In re FD

245 SW3d 110 (2008). In the Matter of FD, a Juvenile. No. 05-06-01712-CV. ... 112 Background. FD pleaded guilty in juvenile court to two counts of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. He was committed to TYC on September 10, 2003, when he was seventeen years old. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Dawn Juvenile Law Lawyer, Texas

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Robert R. Jones III

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Lacy Elise Miller

Courtney Nicole Wiggins

Maurita Erin Mulanax

Jacob David Schmidt

Jacob D. Schmidt

Greta Rapstine Crofford

Robyn Nicole Nance

James Clark

Quenton Todd Hatter

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

SELF-INCRIMINATION

VENIREMEN

MCNAGHTEN RULE

ARREST

CRIMINAL INSANITY

ASSAULT

INFORMED CONSENT

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Meadoux v. State

In re Hall

In re FD

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details