Dayton Criminal Lawyer, Idaho

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Craig Parrish
About | Practice Areas
Parrish Law Office
602 S 5th Ave P.O. Box 4321 Pocatello, ID 83205» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Quality & Caring Legal Services

Craig Parrish is a dedicated lawyer to his clients in the state of Idaho & focuses on helping those in need of quality, inexpensive legal assistance.

800-878-3120
1. Craig Parrish Pocatello, ID
  Attorney at Law - ID, 1993
  University of Idaho J.D. 1993
2. AboutParrish Law Office
  Quality & Caring Legal Services
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Dayton Criminal lawyer.
Below are all Dayton lawyers.

Chester F Brough

General Practice

Status: Inactive Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

785 N. 4900 W., Dayton, ID 83232

Spencer Larsen

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

64 East 200 South, Clifton, ID 83228

Ronnie Jace Keller

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 3 Years

CONTACT

128 N. Center Street, Weston, ID 83286

Ronald Eugene Mumford

Government

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

Clifton, ID 83228

Ronald Mumford

General Practice

Status: Suspended Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

Clifton, ID 83228

Vic A Pearson

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

39 W. Oneida St, Preston, ID 83263

Eric Sherman Hunn

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

39 W. Oneida St, Preston, ID 83263

Jared Coburn

Other, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

134 N State, Preston, ID 83263

Jay Russel Mckenzie

Commercial Real Estate, Government, Estate Planning, Bankruptcy & Debt

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

102 N. State Street, Preston, ID 83263

Adam Jay Mckenzie

Government

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

130 N. State Street, Preston, ID 83263

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

CRIMINAL LAW

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not p... (more...)

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not punishable by imprisonment. In order to be found guilty of a criminal law, the prosecution must show that the defendant intended to act as he did; in civil law, you may sometimes be responsible for your actions even though you did not intend the consequences. For example, civil law makes you financially responsible for a car accident you caused but didn't intend.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

CONSTABLE

A peace officer for a particular geographic area -- most often a rural county -- who commonly has the power to serve legal papers, arrest lawbreakers and keep t... (more...)

A peace officer for a particular geographic area -- most often a rural county -- who commonly has the power to serve legal papers, arrest lawbreakers and keep the peace. Depending on the state, a constable may be similar to a marshal or sheriff.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Yakovac

... III. ANALYSIS. This case presents issues on direct appeal from the criminal proceeding and issues on appeal from the post-conviction relief action. ... 1. Applicable Legal Standard. A post-conviction relief petition initiates a civil, rather than criminal, proceeding. ...

Pizzuto v. State

... He also filed a motion under Rule 35 of the Idaho Criminal Rules to correct an illegal sentence, alleging that under Ring his sentence was illegal because a judge rather than a jury had made the factual findings upon which imposition of the death penalty was based. ...

State v. Bishop

... 690, 694-95, 66 L.Ed.2d 621, 628-29 (1981). An informant's tip regarding suspected criminal activity may give rise to reasonable suspicion when it would "warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief that a stop was appropriate." White, 496 US at 329, 110 S.Ct. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Dayton Criminal Lawyer, Idaho

Sponsored Law Firm

Parrish Law Office

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Chester F Brough

Spencer Larsen

Ronnie Jace Keller

Ronald Eugene Mumford

Ronald Mumford

Vic A Pearson

Eric Sherman Hunn

Jared Coburn

Jay Russel Mckenzie

Adam Jay Mckenzie

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

GRAND JURY

PROSECUTE

CRIMINAL LAW

DIRECTED VERDICT

HUNG JURY

CONSTABLE

HABEAS CORPUS

INFORMED CONSENT

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Yakovac

Pizzuto v. State

State v. Bishop

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details