Haddock DUI-DWI Lawyer, Georgia, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:
Lawyer Thomas Ford
State & Federal Law
The Ford Law Firm

Assault, DUI, Firearms, Murder, more...
Expect Results, Not Excuses

I understand how the system works. Potentially, even getting the case dismissed before it is ever filed against youâ€¦it is important to act quickly. Call now at the number below.

800-298-1630
1. Thomas Ford Alpharetta, GA
  Attorney At Law - GA, 1996
  University of Florida, J.D. - 1995
2. State & Federal Law
  Criminal cases are filed in both State and Federal Courts. Click for Info.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Nicholas Earl White

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Federal Trial Practice

Status: Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

329 Margie Drive, Warner Robins, GA 31088

Rabb Wilkerson

Family Law, Divorce, DUI-DWI, Insurance

Status:

CONTACT

151 S. Houston Lake Rd, Warner Robins, GA 31088

Richard D. C. Schrade

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor

Status: Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

146 Atlanta Street, McDonough, GA 30253

Richard W. Creswell

Civil Rights, DUI-DWI, Traffic, Personal Injury

Status: Licensed: 54 Years

CONTACT

1021 Georgia Ave, Macon, GA 31207

Rick Islieb

DUI-DWI, Civil Rights, Bankruptcy, Car Accident

Status:

CONTACT

1122 Monticello Street, Covington, GA 30014

Samuel Ryan Dixon

Traffic, Child Custody, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

125 N Franklin Street, Dublin, GA 31021

Sherry Lynn Johnson

Social Security, DUI-DWI, Bankruptcy, Personal Injury

Status: Licensed: 8 Years

CONTACT

3333 Vineville Ave, Macon, GA 31204

Travis Griffin

State Appellate Practice, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

341 3Rd St., Macon, GA 31201

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

CONSTABLE

A peace officer for a particular geographic area -- most often a rural county -- who commonly has the power to serve legal papers, arrest lawbreakers and keep t... (more...)

A peace officer for a particular geographic area -- most often a rural county -- who commonly has the power to serve legal papers, arrest lawbreakers and keep the peace. Depending on the state, a constable may be similar to a marshal or sheriff.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Underwood

... Did the Court of Appeals err in affirming the grant of a defendant's motion to suppress the results of a State-administered breath test where an officer who had probable cause to arrest a defendant for DUI read the implied consent rights of OCGA Â§ 40-5-55[ [2] ] to the defendant ...

State v. Rish

... In granting that motion, the trial court found that the State lacked probable cause to arrest Rish for DUI-less safe (OCGA Â§ 40-6-391(a)(1)). While we affirm the trial court's ruling on this issue, we also find that, as a matter of law, the State did have probable cause to arrest Rish for ...

Wade v. State

... Following a bench trial, factually stipulated for trial purposes (to preclude the State's witnesses from having to appear), while preserving the due process issues for appellate review, Brittany Wade appeals her conviction of DUI less-safe, [1] contending that her bent of mind or ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Haddock DUI-DWI Lawyer, Georgia, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

The Ford Law Firm

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Nicholas Earl White

Rabb Wilkerson

Richard D. C. Schrade

Richard W. Creswell

Rick Islieb

Samuel Ryan Dixon

Sherry Lynn Johnson

Travis Griffin

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

ACQUITTAL

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

CONSTABLE

INTERROGATION

MCNAGHTEN RULE

DIRECTED VERDICT

INSANITY

PLEA

LINEUP

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Underwood

State v. Rish

Wade v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS