Iron County, UT Land Use & Zoning Lawyers

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Michael Hepworth
About | Practice Areas
Hepworth & Associates
320 W 500 S Suite 200 Bountiful, UT 84010Â» view map
Real Estate
Things Get Better From Here

Providing professional and compassionate representation in various real estate cases. Hepworth & Associates are tough, strong and fair attorneys.

801-872-2222
1. Michael Hepworth Bountiful, UT
  Attorney at Law - UT, 2014
  Sturm College of Law J.D.
2. AboutHepworth & Associates
  We Are Here to Help
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Real Estate
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Iron Land Use & Zoning lawyer.
Below are all Iron Real Estate lawyers.

John David Westwood

Civil Rights, Estate Planning, Commercial Real Estate, Wills

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 15 Years

CONTACT

98 W Harding Ave, Cedar City, UT 84720

David Westwood

Real Estate, Litigation, Trusts

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

337 S Main St, Cedar City, UT 84720

J David Westwood

Commercial Real Estate, Litigation, Lawsuit & Dispute, Trusts

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

444 S Main St, Cedar City, UT 84720

J David Westwood

Commercial Real Estate, Litigation, Lawsuit & Dispute, Trusts

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

444 S Main St, Cedar City, UT 84720

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PRECEDENT

A legal principle or rule created by one or more decisions of a state or federal appellate court. These rules provide a point of reference or authority for judg... (more...)

A legal principle or rule created by one or more decisions of a state or federal appellate court. These rules provide a point of reference or authority for judges deciding similar issues in later cases. Lower courts must apply these rules when faced with similar legal issues. For example, if the Montana Supreme Court decides that a certain type of employment contract overly restricts the right of the employee to quit and get another job, all other Montana courts must apply this same rule.

FORFEITURE

The loss of property or a privilege due to breaking a law. For example, a landlord may forfeit his or her property to the federal or state government if the lan... (more...)

The loss of property or a privilege due to breaking a law. For example, a landlord may forfeit his or her property to the federal or state government if the landlord knows it is a drug-dealing site but fails to stop the illegal activity. Or, you may have to forfeit your driver's license if you commit too many moving violations or are convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

The legally prescribed time limit in which a lawsuit must be filed. Statutes of limitation differ depending on the type of legal claim, and often the state. For... (more...)

The legally prescribed time limit in which a lawsuit must be filed. Statutes of limitation differ depending on the type of legal claim, and often the state. For example, many states require that a personal injury lawsuit be filed within one year from the date of injury -- or in some instances, from the date when it should reasonably have been discovered -- but some allow two years. Similarly, claims based on a written contract must be filed in court within four years from the date the contract was broken in some states and five years in others. Statute of limitations rules apply to cases filed in all courts, including federal court.

LANDLORD

The owner of any real estate, such as a house, apartment building or land, that is leased or rented to another person, called the tenant.

LIQUID ASSETS

Business property that can be quickly and easily converted into cash, such as stock, bank accounts and accounts receivable.

DIRECT EXAMINATION

At trial, the initial questioning of a party or witness by the side that called him or her to testify. The major purpose of direct examination is to explain you... (more...)

At trial, the initial questioning of a party or witness by the side that called him or her to testify. The major purpose of direct examination is to explain your version of events to the judge or jury and to undercut your adversary's version. Good direct examination seeks to prove all facts necessary to satisfy the plaintiff's legal claims or causes of action -- for example, that the defendant breached a valid contract and, as a result, the plaintiff suffered a loss.

APPRAISER

A person who is hired to determine the current value of real estate or other property.

ELEMENTS (OF A CASE)

The component parts of a legal claim or cause of action. To win a lawsuit, a plaintiff must prove every element of a legal claim. For example, here are the elem... (more...)

The component parts of a legal claim or cause of action. To win a lawsuit, a plaintiff must prove every element of a legal claim. For example, here are the elements of a breach of contract claim: There was a valid contract. The plaintiff performed as specified by the contract. The defendant failed to perform as specified by the contract. The plaintiff suffered an economic loss as a result of the defendant's breach of contract.

PATENT CLAIM

A statement included in a patent application that describes the structure of an invention in precise and exact terms, using a long established formal style and ... (more...)

A statement included in a patent application that describes the structure of an invention in precise and exact terms, using a long established formal style and precise terminology. Patent claims serve as a way for the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to determine whether an invention is patentable, and as a way for a court to determine whether a patent has been infringed. In concept, a patent claim marks the boundaries of the patent in the same way as the legal description in a deed specifies the boundaries of the property.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Friends of Maple Mountain v. Mapleton City

... 18.30.080(B). CE-1 zoning does not prevent development, but rather controls density. ... II. ADOPTION OF A NEW ZONING CLASSIFICATION IS PER SE LEGISLATIVE ACTION. Â¶ 14 While we accept the trial court's findings of fact, its legal conclusions are more troublesome. ...

Lunt v. Lance

... In September 1998â€”more than seven years prior to commencement of this suitâ€”Boren appeared before the Heber City Planning Commission in an attempt to change the zoning of a portion of the Lunt property from agricultural to residential. ...

Fox v. Park City

... evidence in the record." [3] A land use authority's decision is illegal if it "violates a law, statute, or ordinance in effect at the time the decision was made." [4] Because a determination of illegality is based on the land use authority's interpretation of zoning ordinances, we review ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Iron County, UT Land Use & Zoning Lawyers

Sponsored Law Firm

Hepworth & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

John David Westwood

David Westwood

J David Westwood

J David Westwood

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PRECEDENT

FORFEITURE

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

LANDLORD

LIQUID ASSETS

DIRECT EXAMINATION

APPRAISER

ELEMENTS (OF A CASE)

PATENT CLAIM

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Friends of Maple Mountain v. Mapleton City

Lunt v. Lance

Fox v. Park City

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details