Kelton White Collar Crime Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Daniel McGarrigle
Testimonials | Contact Us
The McGarrigle Law Firm
1500 Walnut Street, 22nd Floor Philadelphia, PA 19102Â» view map
White Collar Crime, Criminal Appeals, DUI&DWI
Trial Experience & Zealous Advocacy

The Firmâ€™s devoted attention to your individual concerns, our vast trial experience in all types of criminal matters, and our skillful advocacy will ensure that your rights are protected.

800-934-5330
1. Daniel McGarrigle Philadelphia, PA
  Attorney At Law - Pennsylvania, 2003
  James E. Beasley School of Law - J.D.
2. TestimonialsRecent Reviews
  Hear what past clients are saying.
3. Contact UsCall or Email
  Call today for your initial free consultation.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Daniel McGarrigle

✓ VERIFIED

Military & Veterans Appeals, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Attorney Daniel McGarrigle is an aggressive advocate and experienced litigator; he has tried hundreds of cases and handled all types of criminal matte... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

610-566-3010

117-119 North Olive Street, Media, PA 19063

Richard John Fuschino

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Felony, White Collar Crime, Federal Trial Practice, Federal Appellate Practice

Protecting Your Freedom and Your Reputation

If you are facing criminal charges in the Pennsylvania state or federal courts, you want a law firm with the experience, guts and the dedication to fi... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-951-3481

1600 Locust St, Philadelphia, PA 19103

Zak Taylor Goldstein

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Felony, Misdemeanor, DUI-DWI, White Collar Crime

Philadelphia Criminal Defense Attorney

Zak Goldstein is a Philadelphia criminal defense and civil rights attorney. Zak Goldstein has experience trying hundreds of cases before judges and ju... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-356-3201

1717 Arch Street, Suite 320, Philadelphia, PA 19107

Heather J. Mattes

Traffic, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

105 South High Street, West Chester, PA 19382

Joseph J. Brielmann

Criminal, DUI-DWI, White Collar Crime

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

18 West Front Street, Media, PA 19063

William R. Bernhart

Traffic, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

537 Court Street, Reading, PA 19601

Sharon Devins Block

Environmental Law, Family Law, White Collar Crime, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2207 Chestnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19103

William J. Murray

Complex Litigation, White Collar Crime, Consumer Rights, Business

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1600 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103

William R. Spade

White Collar Crime, Criminal, Civil & Human Rights, Securities

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1525 Locust Street, Philadelphia, PA 19102

Gino J. Benedetti

Employment, White Collar Crime, Insurance, Corporate

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1500 Market St. 3500E, Philadelphia, PA 19102

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

BAIL

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all requi... (more...)

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all required court appearances. The amount of bail is determined by the local bail schedule, which is based on the seriousness of the offense. The judge can increase the bail if the prosecutor convinces him that the defendant is likely to flee (for example, if he has failed to show up in court in the past), or he can decrease it if the defense attorney shows that the defendant is unlikely to run (for example, he has strong ties to the community by way of a steady job and a family).

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Kelton White Collar Crime Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

The McGarrigle Law Firm

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Daniel McGarrigle

Richard John Fuschino

Zak Taylor Goldstein

Heather J. Mattes

Joseph J. Brielmann

William R. Bernhart

Sharon Devins Block

William J. Murray

William R. Spade

Gino J. Benedetti

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

NOLO CONTENDERE

ASSAULT

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

BAIL

INSANITY

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

EAVESDROPPING

SELF-INCRIMINATION

DIRECTED VERDICT

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details