Maple Park Criminal Lawyer, Illinois

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Gordon H. Hirsch
About | Practice Areas
Hirsch Law Group
128 N. Scott St. Joliet, IL 60432» view map
Criminal Defense Law
We Defend Tough Cases

From simple, petty cases to the most complex criminal charges, we are dedicated to providing aggressive legal services to our clients.

800-878-2530
1. Gordon H. Hirsch Joliet, IL
  Attorney at Law - IL, 2000
  DePaul University J.D. 2000
2. AboutHirsch Law Group
  Former Prosecutor Turned Aggressive Criminal Defense Attorney
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Bruce Brennan

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Traffic, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

112 Orchard Ln, Dekalb, IL 60115

Nancy Alamia

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

1109 East Lincoln Highway, Dekalb, IL 60115

Robert P. Carlson

Landlord-Tenant, Estate Planning, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Child Custody

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

317 E Locust St, Dekalb, IL 60115

Jason Laurence Traub

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 9 Years

CONTACT

1504 Cambria Drive, DeKalb, IL 60115

Kimberley Klein

Traffic, Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

37W777 Route 38, Elburn, IL 60175

William Bochte

Divorce, DUI-DWI, Civil Rights, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 56 Years

CONTACT

2580 Fox Field Rd, Elburn, IL 60174

Kimberley Crum Klein

Traffic, Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

37W777 Route 38, Elburn, IL 60175

Charles R. Rea

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Traffic, Real Estate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

1122 Motz Street, Elburn, IL 60119

Valerie Anne Donahue

Criminal

Status: Inactive Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

39W665 Terney Square, Geneva, IL 60134

Dana Fortunato

Immigration, Family Law, Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

37 W 655 Rt 38, Saint Charles, IL 60175

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to perm... (more...)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. Each of those four parts is an element that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Leonard

... Defendant Finis Leonard was convicted by a jury of the offenses of habitual armed criminal and unlawful possession of a weapon by a felon and sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 30 years and 10 years, respectively. He appealed. We affirm. FACTS. ...

People v. Jackson

... were, therefore, admissible. Defendant also filed a motion in limine to preclude any evidence of his 1998 conviction for criminal sexual assault, which had required him to submit a DNA sample to be placed in a database. At the ...

People v. Pelo

... Interveners-appellants, The Pantagraph newspaper and its reporter Edith Brady Lunny (Pantagraph), filed a petition to intervene and gain access to an evidence deposition in a criminal case, People v. Pelo (Nos. ... The underlying criminal case, People v. Pelo (Nos. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Maple Park Criminal Lawyer, Illinois

Sponsored Law Firm

Hirsch Law Group

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Bruce Brennan

Nancy Alamia

Robert P. Carlson

Jason Laurence Traub

Kimberley Klein

William Bochte

Kimberley Crum Klein

Charles R. Rea

Valerie Anne Donahue

Dana Fortunato

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CHARGE

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

SPECIFIC INTENT

HABEAS CORPUS

NOLO CONTENDERE

CAPITAL CASE

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

SELF-INCRIMINATION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Leonard

People v. Jackson

People v. Pelo

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details