Mayer Felony Lawyer, Arizona

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Kenneth Countryman
About | Practice Areas
Kenneth S. Countryman, P.C.
1130 North 2nd Street P.O. BOX 11077 Phoenix, AZ 85004» view map
Criminal Defense Law
A Law Firm You Can Trust

Let Kenneth S. Countryman, P.C. handle your criminal defense legal matters.

800-978-0861
1. Kenneth Countryman Phoenix, AZ
  Attorney at Law- AZ
  Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law, J.D. 1994
2. AboutKenneth S. Countryman, P.C.
  A Law Firm You Can Trust
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Mayer Felony lawyer.
Below are all Mayer Criminal lawyers.

Craig Williams

Domestic Violence & Neglect, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

3681 North Robert Road, Prescott Valley, AZ 86314

Ida B Wilber

Criminal, Indians & Native Populations, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

Camp Verde, AZ 86322

Lisa Marie Simpson

Dispute Resolution, Juvenile Law, Bankruptcy, Animal Bite

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

13833 S Bluebird Ln, Mayer, AZ 86333

Linda L Pilcher

Juvenile Law, Other, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

Dewey, AZ 86327

Linda L Pilcher

Juvenile Law, Other, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

Dewey, AZ 86327

Richard M. Anderson

Immigration, White Collar Crime, Business & Trade, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 53 Years

CONTACT

Camp Verde, AZ 86322

Michael R Bluff

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

2840 N Commonwealth Dr, Camp Verde, AZ 86322

Michael R Bluff

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

2840 N Commonwealth Dr, Camp Verde, AZ 86322

Andrew Todd Wirth

Criminal, Business & Trade, Trusts

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

12150 E Turquoise Cir, Dewey, AZ 86327

Ethan A Wolfinger

Litigation, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

2830 N Commonwealth Dr, Camp Verde, AZ 86322

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

CRIMINAL CASE

A lawsuit brought by a prosecutor employed by the federal, state or local government that charges a person with the commission of a crime.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the l... (more...)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the level of alcohol or drugs in the driver's body must simply be enough to prevent him from thinking clearly or driving safely. State laws specify the levels of blood alcohol content at which a person is presumed to be under the influence. Also called driving while intoxicated (DWI and drunk driving).

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Smith

... RYAN, Justice. Â¶ 1 This case requires us to decide if a defendant's claim that prior felony convictions from other jurisdictions are legally insufficient for sentence enhancement purposes can be reviewed on appeal when he did not preserve the claim in the trial court. ...

State v. Peek

... as follows: After conviction of a felony offense that is included in chapter 14 of this title, if probation is available, probation may continue for a term . . . up ... B. Construing "a felony offense that is included in chapter 14". Â¶ 11 When Peek ...

State v. Martinez

... B. Â¶ 13 In the fall of 2005, a jury found Martinez guilty of premeditated first degree murder, felony murder, and kidnapping. ... B. Â¶ 21 The jury returned separate verdicts finding that Martinez committed felony murder and premeditated murder. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Mayer Felony Lawyer, Arizona

Sponsored Law Firm

Kenneth S. Countryman, P.C.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Craig Williams

Ida B Wilber

Lisa Marie Simpson

Linda L Pilcher

Linda L Pilcher

Richard M. Anderson

Michael R Bluff

Michael R Bluff

Andrew Todd Wirth

Ethan A Wolfinger

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INTERROGATION

CRIMINAL CASE

HABEAS CORPUS

SELF-INCRIMINATION

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

PROSECUTE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

DIRECTED VERDICT

EAVESDROPPING

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Smith

State v. Peek

State v. Martinez

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details