Milton Juvenile Law Lawyer, Iowa

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Scott Schroeder
About | Lawyer Profile
Clark & Schroeder, PLLC
231 S 3rd St Suite B, Burlington, IA 52601» view map
Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family, Juvenile Law
Let Us Handle Your Legal Needs!

They are trial lawyers, so they specialize in anything that requires going to court– especially family law and criminal defense.

800-908-7021
1. Scott Schroeder Burlington, IA
  Attorney at Law - IA, 1995
  Drake University Law School, J.D. 1995
2. AboutClark & Schroeder, PLLC
  divorces and custody cases, criminal defense, personal injury, and bankruptcy
3. Lawyer Profile
  Scott Schroeder is a practicing lawyer in the state of Iowa.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Milton Juvenile Law lawyer.
Below are all Milton lawyers.

Abraham K Watkins

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

211 Main St, Keosauqua, IA 52565

William W. C. Glass

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

501 Dodge Street, Keosauqua, IA 52565

G. Robert Sackett

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 65 Years

CONTACT

505 Cass St, Keosauqua, IA 52565

H. Craig Miller

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

903 4Th St, Keosauqua, IA 52565

James W. Mc Grath

General Practice

Status: Deceased

CONTACT

502 Dodge St, Keosauqua, IA 52565

Jo S. Stong

General Practice

Status: Deceased

CONTACT

Keosauqua, IA 52565

Richard H. Lytle

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Keosauqua, IA 52565

Ronald Kent Watkins

General Practice

Status: Retired Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

402 4Th St, Keosauqua, IA 52565

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

CRIME

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defin... (more...)

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defined by Congress and state legislatures.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

ARREST

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arre... (more...)

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arrest' even though the police have not announced it; nor are handcuffs or physical restraint necessary. Questioning an arrested person about her involvement in or knowledge of a crime must be preceded by the Miranda warnings if the police intend to use the answers against the person in a criminal case. If the arrested person chooses to remain silent, the questioning must stop.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

SENTENCE

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by ... (more...)

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by the trial judge; the jury chooses the sentence only in a capital case, when it must choose between life in prison without parole and death.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

VENIREMEN

People who are summoned to the courthouse so that they may be questioned and perhaps chosen as jurors in trials of civil or criminal cases.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

In re PL

... Jessica Knoll, Sioux City, for mother. Marchelle Denker of Sioux City Juvenile Office, Sioux City, Guardian Ad Litem for minor child. ... WIGGINS, Justice. In this case, we must decide if the juvenile court was correct in terminating a father's parental rights. ...

In re DW

... CADY, Justice. In this case, the State requests further review of the court of appeals' decision reversing an order by the juvenile court terminating a mother's parental rights. ... As a result, we vacate the decision of the court of appeals and affirm the decision of the juvenile court. ...

State v. DIST. CT. FOR JOHNSON CTY.

... WIGGINS, Justice. The issue we must decide is whether the juvenile court can require the department of human services to pay the cost of detaining a juvenile in a detention center while waiting for placement in a group care residential treatment facility. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Milton Juvenile Law Lawyer, Iowa

Sponsored Law Firm

Clark & Schroeder, PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Abraham K Watkins

William W. C. Glass

G. Robert Sackett

H. Craig Miller

James W. Mc Grath

Jo S. Stong

Richard H. Lytle

Ronald Kent Watkins

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INTERROGATION

CRIME

ACTUS REUS

ARREST

SPECIFIC INTENT

INDECENT EXPOSURE

SENTENCE

BURDEN OF PROOF

VENIREMEN

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

In re PL

In re DW

State v. DIST. CT. FOR JOHNSON CTY.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details