Montesano Criminal Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Ronnie Soriano
About | Practice Areas
Soriano Law
104 W. Marcy Ave Montesano, WA 98563» view map
Criminal Law
Where You Need to Be

An integral part of our legal services is to work closely with clients so that they can make the right decisions with respect to their legal needs.

800-337-9120
1. Ronnie Soriano 104 W. Marcy Ave Montesano, WA
  Attorney at Law- WA, 2010
  Whittier Law School, J.D. 2005
2. AboutSoriano Law
  Where You Need to Be
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Wayne D. Hagen

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Personal Injury, DUI-DWI, Business

Since the firm was established in 1993, the skilled attorneys at Hagen & Bates P.S. have provided versatile, professional and effective solutions to a... (more)

CONTACT

800-899-6251

316 East 1st St, Aberdeen, WA 98520

Stephen Olson

Car Accident, Personal Injury, Child Custody, Divorce, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

104 Marcy Ave, Montesano, WA 98563

Robert Ehrhardt

Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

Montesano, WA 98563

Harold S. Menefee

State Government, Criminal, Securities Regulation, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

1285 Lawrence Dr, Montesano, WA 98563

Georgia Ann Stearns

State Government, Employee Rights, Juvenile Law, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

8 Coady Ln, Hoquiam, WA 98550

Jack Bradford Micheau

Family Law, State Government, Indians & Native Populations, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 41 Years

CONTACT

Aberdeen, WA 98520

Paul Douglas Conroy

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

Aberdeen, WA 98520

Steven Ross Johnson

Municipal, Government, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

609 8Th St, Hoquiam, WA 98550

Beth Clark Gobich

Juvenile Law

Status: Inactive Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

216 Garfield St, Hoquiam, WA 98550

Amanda Kleespie

Juvenile Law, Federal, Criminal, Indians & Native Populations

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

Taholah, WA 98587

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

GREEN CARD

The well-known term for an Alien Registration Receipt Card. This plastic photo identification card is given to individuals who are legal permanent residents of ... (more...)

The well-known term for an Alien Registration Receipt Card. This plastic photo identification card is given to individuals who are legal permanent residents of the United States. It serves as a U.S. entry document in place of a visa, enabling permanent residents to return to the United States after temporary absences. The key characteristic of a green card is that it allows the holder to live permanently in the United States. Unless you abandon your residence or violate certain criminal or immigration laws, your green card can never be taken away. Possession of a green card also allows you to work in the United States legally. Those who hold green cards for a certain length of time may eventually apply for U.S. citizenship. Green cards have an expiration date of ten years from issuance. This does not mean that your permanent resident status expires. You must simply apply for a new card.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

... The Court of Appeals in each case held that the sentencing court improperly relied upon the State's assertion of the defendant's criminal history where the defendant did not stipulate to the criminal history and the State did not provide any evidence to establish the prior ...

State v. Momah

... 10 Article I, section 10 provides that "[j]ustice in all cases shall be administered openly." The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 22 of the Washington Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant the right to a "public trial by an impartial jury ...

State v. Codiga

... 2 Discovery of additional criminal history, rather than legal error, caused the increased offender score in this case. Codiga's ... form. Â¶ 5 The plea form also lists the prosecuting attorney's statement of Codiga's criminal history. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Montesano Criminal Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

Soriano Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Wayne D. Hagen

Stephen Olson

Robert Ehrhardt

Harold S. Menefee

Georgia Ann Stearns

Jack Bradford Micheau

Paul Douglas Conroy

Steven Ross Johnson

Beth Clark Gobich

Amanda Kleespie

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INSANITY

GREEN CARD

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

HABEAS CORPUS

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

EAVESDROPPING

ASSAULT

SELF-DEFENSE

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

State v. Momah

State v. Codiga

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details