Niobe DUI-DWI Lawyer, New York

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Mark Guralnick
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick
55 Madison Avenue 4th Floor Morristown, NJ 07960Â» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Dedicated. Fearless. Successful.

Mark S. Guralnick and his legal team have helped clients throughout the USA and across the world by applying unparalleled dedication and hard work to each case.

800-399-8371
1. Mark Guralnick Morristown, NJ
  Attorney at Law - NJ, 1984
  Shepard Broad Law Center J.D.1984
2. AboutLaw Office of Mark S. Guralnick
  Our firm assists clients in a wide variety of legal challenges.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Niobe DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Niobe Criminal lawyers.

Lyle T. Hajdu

Estate Planning, Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

Lakewood, NY 14750

Lyle T. Hajdu

Traffic, Motor Vehicle, Divorce, DUI-DWI, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Lakewood, NY 14750

Scott Frederick Humble

Divorce, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Bankruptcy & Debt

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

7 Jackson Ave Ne, Jamestown, NY 14701

Neil Macdonald Robinson

Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

501 W 3Rd St, Jamestown, NY 14701

Andrew William Goodell

Lawsuit, Sexual Harassment, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

617 Washington St, Jamestown, NY 14701

Sally Ann Jaroszynski

DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

20 W 3Rd St, Jamestown, NY 14701

Paul V. Webb

Lawsuit & Dispute, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

414 E Fairmount Ave, Lakewood, NY 14750

Paul V. Webb

Estate Planning, Alimony & Spousal Support, Divorce, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

414 E Fairmount Ave, Lakewood, NY 14750

Stephen Elmer Sellstrom

Real Estate, Lawsuit & Dispute, Estate, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

Stow, NY 14785

David R. Roggenbaum

Dispute Resolution, Child Custody, Civil & Human Rights, Car Accident, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

102 School Ave, Jamestown, NY 14701

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

BAIL

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all requi... (more...)

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all required court appearances. The amount of bail is determined by the local bail schedule, which is based on the seriousness of the offense. The judge can increase the bail if the prosecutor convinces him that the defendant is likely to flee (for example, if he has failed to show up in court in the past), or he can decrease it if the defense attorney shows that the defendant is unlikely to run (for example, he has strong ties to the community by way of a steady job and a family).

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Baltes

... In the interim, Jenkins completed the field sobriety tests on Barcomb and, determining Barcomb to be under the influence of alcohol, arrested him for driving while intoxicated (hereinafter DWI), at which point Barcomb stated that he was not the driver of the vehicle. ...

MATTER OF SCHERMERHORN v. Becker

... and GARRY, JJ., concur. Stein, J. Petitioner was arrested in the Village of Stamford, Delaware 844 County for driving while intoxicated (hereinafter DWI). According to the results of a breath test administered shortly thereafter, petitioner's blood alcohol content was .15%. ...

People v. Johnson

... and McCARTHY, JJ., concur. Stein, J. Defendant was arrested and subsequently indicted for driving 1189 while intoxicated (hereinafter DWI). In addition, a special information filed by the People accused defendant of having been previously convicted of DWI. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Niobe DUI-DWI Lawyer, New York

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Lyle T. Hajdu

Lyle T. Hajdu

Scott Frederick Humble

Neil Macdonald Robinson

Andrew William Goodell

Sally Ann Jaroszynski

Paul V. Webb

Paul V. Webb

Stephen Elmer Sellstrom

David R. Roggenbaum

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

HUNG JURY

INDECENT EXPOSURE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

CHARGE

BAIL

MOTION IN LIMINE

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

CRIMINAL INSANITY

PLEA BARGAIN

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Baltes

MATTER OF SCHERMERHORN v. Becker

People v. Johnson

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details