North Myrtle Beach Juvenile Law Lawyer, South Carolina

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

William Grammer
About | Practice Areas
Grammer Law Firm, P.C.
1700 Oak St Conway, SC 29526Â» view map
Criminal
Proudly Serving Horry County

You need an attorney with criminal defense knowledge who will vigorously protect your rights and interests.

800-957-8401
1. William Grammer Myrtle Beach, SC
  Attorney at Law - SC, 1999
  University of Memphis J.D. 1998
2. AboutGrammer Law Firm, P.C.
  Over 18 years of experience.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for North Myrtle Beach Juvenile Law lawyer.
Below are all North Myrtle Beach Criminal lawyers.

Jeffrey T. Lucas

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal

Attorney Lucas grew up in the small town of Great Falls in upstate South Carolina. Following high school, he attended Coastal Carolina University (CCU... (more)

CONTACT

803-374-0389

P.O. Box 9299, Myrtle Beach, SC 29577

William H. Monckton

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Accident & Injury

WILLIAM H. MONCKTON, VI I graduated from the University of South Carolina School of Law in 1992. After graduation, I served as a judicial law clerk fo... (more)

CONTACT

800-864-5291

1300 Professional Dr, Myrtle Beach, SC 29577

David E. Rigney

✓ VERIFIED

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Traffic, Business, Immigration

If you have been injured or are disabled, give me a call. If you need legal advice before you sign a contract, enter into a lease, or sign a business... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

843-352-3529

1500 Highway 17 North, Myrtle Beach, SC 29575

Melissa Meyers Frazier

Juvenile Law, Divorce, Child Support, Child Custody

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

3303 Hwy 9, E, Little River, SC 29566

Lacey Marie Lee

DUI-DWI, Traffic, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1053 London Street, Myrtle Beach, SC 29577

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

DISTRICT ATTORNEY (D.A.)

A lawyer who is elected to represent a state government in criminal cases in a designated county or judicial district. A D.A.'s duties typically include reviewi... (more...)

A lawyer who is elected to represent a state government in criminal cases in a designated county or judicial district. A D.A.'s duties typically include reviewing police arrest reports, deciding whether to bring criminal charges against arrested people and prosecuting criminal cases in court. The D.A. may also supervise other attorneys, called Deputy District Attorneys or Assistant District Attorneys. In some states a District Attorney may be called a Prosecuting Attorney, County Attorney or State's Attorney. In the federal system, the equivalent to the D.A. is a United States Attorney. The country has many U.S. Attorneys, each appointed by the President, who supervise regional offices staffed with prosecutors called Assistant United States Attorneys.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Jones

... KONDUROS, J. Tyquan Jared Amir Jones was charged as a juvenile with murder, armed robbery, and unlawful possession of a pistol. ... Keith later died from the injury. Jones was charged as a juvenile with murder, armed robbery, and unlawful possession of a pistol. ...

In re Walter M.

... aforethought. The family court found Appellant guilty of murder and sentenced him to confinement in a juvenile facility for an indeterminate amount of time not to exceed his twenty first birthday. This appeal follows. ISSUES. I. Did ...

State v. Jones

... KONDUROS, J.: Tyquan Jared Amir Jones was charged as a juvenile with murder, armed robbery, and unlawful possession of a pistol. ... Keith later died from the injury. Jones was charged as a juvenile with murder, armed robbery, and unlawful possession of a pistol. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

North Myrtle Beach Juvenile Law Lawyer, South Carolina

Sponsored Law Firm

Grammer Law Firm, P.C.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Jeffrey T. Lucas

William H. Monckton

David E. Rigney

Melissa Meyers Frazier

Lacey Marie Lee

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

INDECENT EXPOSURE

JURY NULLIFICATION

DISTRICT ATTORNEY (D.A.)

SELF-DEFENSE

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

NOLO CONTENDERE

SPECIFIC INTENT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Jones

In re Walter M.

State v. Jones

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details