Osburn Juvenile Law Lawyer, Idaho

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Michael Waldrup
About | Practice Areas
Waldrup Law Office
105 N First Ave. P.O. Box 2659 Sandpoint, ID 83864» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Experience & Integrity You Can Trust

Whether you are a first timer or have prior charges or convictions the lawyer you choose is of the utmost importance. Let me worry about the details.

800-957-6511
1. Michael Waldrup Sandpoint, ID
  Attorney at Law - ID, 1999
  University of Idaho J.D. 1998
2. AboutWaldrup Law Office
  Sandpoint, Idaho Attorney who will protect your rights.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Osburn Juvenile Law lawyer.
Below are all Osburn lawyers.

Courtney Karen Frieh

Land Use & Zoning, Environmental Law, Elder Law, Disability

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

103 Cedar St, Wallace, ID 83873

Craig Charles Kosonen

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 63 Years

CONTACT

Osburn, ID 83849

Daniel John Mcgee

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

Silverton, ID 83867

Hollis Jane Anderson

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

125 Cedar Street, Wallace, ID 83873

Michael Kenneth Branstetter

Government, Estate, Employment, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

Osburn, ID 83849

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

BURGLARY

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need no... (more...)

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need not be theft. For instance, someone would be guilty of burglary if he entered a house through an unlocked door in order to commit a murder.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

INFRACTION

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, ho... (more...)

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, however--refusing to identify oneself when involved in an accident is a misdemeanor in some states.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Doe

... Ken Jorgensen argued. HORTON, Justice. This appeal arises from an order by a juvenile court denying Doe's motion to dismiss the State's petition for a probation violation for lack of jurisdiction. Doe appeals the district court's decision affirming the magistrate's order. ...

In re Doe

... In addition to the charges, the State filed a motion to waive juvenile court jurisdiction over Doe. The 976 juvenile court granted the State's motion and entered an order waiving Doe into adult court. Doe appealed the order to the district court, which affirmed the waiver order. ...

State v. Doe

... petit theft. At the disposition hearing the following month, the magistrate found the Does' daughter to be under the purview of the Juvenile Corrections Act ("JCA") and imposed informal probation on her for her offenses. Because ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Osburn Juvenile Law Lawyer, Idaho

Sponsored Law Firm

Waldrup Law Office

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Courtney Karen Frieh

Craig Charles Kosonen

Daniel John Mcgee

Hollis Jane Anderson

Michael Kenneth Branstetter

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

ASSAULT

BURGLARY

ACTUS REUS

CAPITAL CASE

BURDEN OF PROOF

SPECIFIC INTENT

INFRACTION

SELF-DEFENSE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Doe

In re Doe

State v. Doe

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details