Prospect Park Criminal Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Lee Ciccarelli
About | Practice Areas
Ciccarelli Law Offices
Numerous Office Locations AvailableÂ» view map
Criminal Defense
Success Is Our Mission

You gain the resources of a Team with 100 years of combined experience fighting for their clients throughout Pennsylvania.

888-240-0896
1. Lee Ciccarelli West Chester, PA
  Attorney at Law - PA, 1989
  George Washington University J.D. 1989
2. AboutCiccarelli Law Offices
  Passionate in what we do and compassionate with our clients.
3. Practice AreasSpecializations
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Lee Ciccarelli

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI

Lee Ciccarelli is the founder and motivating force behind Ciccarelli Law Offices, a law firm with a team approach aimed at engaging our clients while ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

888-240-0896

1489 Baltimore Pike, Springfield, PA 19064

Gerard Killard Schrom

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, 3M, Hair Straightener, Criminal, Lawsuit & Dispute

Gerard earned his Juris Doctor from the Widener University School of Law and went on to focus his practice around criminal defense and civil litigatio... (more)

CONTACT

610-247-0303

4 West Front Street, Media, PA 19063

Daniel McGarrigle

✓ VERIFIED

Military & Veterans Appeals, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Attorney Daniel McGarrigle is an aggressive advocate and experienced litigator; he has tried hundreds of cases and handled all types of criminal matte... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

610-566-3010

117-119 North Olive Street, Media, PA 19063

Christopher Bokas

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Car Accident, Wrongful Death, DUI-DWI, Felony

Attorney Christopher Bokas handles all felonies and misdemeanors, including white collar crimes, juvenile crimes, drug offenses, parol and probation v... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-997-6550

20 West Third Street, Media, PA 19063

Bernard M. Berman

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Corporate, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

20 West Third Street, Media, PA 19063

Gregory J. Spadea

Estate Planning, Criminal, Real Estate, Divorce & Family Law, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

204 E. Chester Pike, Ridley Park, PA 19078

Kenneth S. Medzie

Bankruptcy, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Estate, Power of Attorney

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

204 E Chester Pk, Ridley Park, PA 19078

Marnie Burk

Lawsuit & Dispute, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

127 W Chester Pike, Ridley Park, PA 19078

Lacy R. Wheeler

Criminal, Lawsuit & Dispute, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

111 Mac Dade Blvd, Folsom, PA 19033

Dawn Sutphin

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

204 E Chester Pike, Ridley Park, PA 19078

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, th... (more...)

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, the crime of aggravated assault is a physical attack made worse because it is committed with a dangerous weapon, results in severe bodily injury or is made in conjunction with another serious crime. Aggravated assault is usually considered a felony, punishable by a prison sentence.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

EXPUNGE

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the crimi... (more...)

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the criminal records of a juvenile offender to be expunged when he reaches the age of majority, to allow him to begin his adult life with a clean record. Or, a company or government agency may routinely expunge out-of-date records to save storage space.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Reinhart v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

... The Department suspended Licensee's operating privileges because of three criminal convictions arising from a single accident: reckless driving; failing to stop his vehicle at an accident scene where 168 death or personal injury was involved; and driving under the influence of ...

Com. v. Abraham

... 3 Abraham was charged with corruption of a minor, 18 Pa.CS Â§ 6301; indecent assault of a person less than 16 years of age, 18 Pa.CS Â§ 3126; endangering the welfare of a child, 18 Pa.CS Â§ 4304; and criminal solicitation, 18 Pa.CS Â§ 5902. ...

Com. v. Baldwin

... According to the Commonwealth, Section 9765 clearly indicates the legislature's intent that criminal defendants' sentences do not merge unless all of the elements of one offense are included within the elements of the other offense. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Prospect Park Criminal Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

Ciccarelli Law Offices

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Lee Ciccarelli

Gerard Killard Schrom

Daniel McGarrigle

Christopher Bokas

Bernard M. Berman

Gregory J. Spadea

Kenneth S. Medzie

Marnie Burk

Lacy R. Wheeler

Dawn Sutphin

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

INFORMED CONSENT

NOLO CONTENDERE

EXPUNGE

JURY NULLIFICATION

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

CHARGE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Reinhart v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

Com. v. Abraham

Com. v. Baldwin

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details