within 20 miles of Georgetown practice in Intellectual Property Kentucky


The Law Office of Robin C. May & Associates

Intellectual Property, Civil & Human Rights, Family Law, Military, Contract

Lawyer.com Featured 

CONTACT

King & Schickli Pllc

Patent, Trademark, Intellectual Property

King & Schickli PLLC

Employee Rights, Intellectual Property, Government, Business, Patent

Friedman Rosenwasser & Goldbaum

Contract, Corporate, Business & Trade, Merger & Acquisition, International Intellectual Property

Wolfe & Houlehan PLLC

Business, Intellectual Property, Divorce & Family Law, Employment, Criminal

Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC

Tax, Intellectual Property, Criminal, Property Damage, Bankruptcy

The Singleton Mims Law Center PLL

Lawsuit & Dispute, Other, Real Estate, Intellectual Property

Dinsmore and Shohl LLP

Intellectual Property, Patent

Montague Law PLLC

Business, Landlord-Tenant, Banking & Finance, Intellectual Property, Lawsuit & Dispute

University of Kentucky Office of Legal Counsel

Intellectual Property, Wills, Estate Planning, Trademark, Trusts

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Papa John's Intern., Inc. v. McCoy

... easily transferable to the franchise relationship." [26] After considering the fact that a franchise is a commercial arrangement between two businesses and the unique aspects of such an arrangement—franchisee authorized to use the franchisor's intellectual property and brand ...

Mickler v. Mickler

... $111,809.03 for her share in Andrew's medical practice, half the proceeds from the sale of the marital residence and another piece of property, her car ... The obvious purpose of the [relevant Pennsylvania statute] is to protect earnings produced by physical or intellectual effort. . . . ...

Gaskill v. Robbins

... It may not be acquired by the mere expenditure of money. It is simply an intellectual achievement that may potentially assist in the future acquisition of property ... [. Id. at 331 (quoting Mahoney v. Mahoney, 182 NJSuper. 598, 442 A.2d 1062, 1066 (1982)). ...