within 300 miles of Hilliard practice in Tax Ohio


Porter Wright

Business, Intellectual Property, Real Estate, International, Tax

Lawyer.com Featured 

CONTACT

Dean Edward Hines Co., Lpa

Divorce & Family Law, Tax

Lawyer.com Featured 

CONTACT

Richard D. Honeck, Attorney at Law

Real Estate, Estate, Tax, Business

Lawyer.com Featured 

CONTACT

Sirvaitis Law LLC.

Estate, Income Tax, Real Estate, Elder Law

Lawyer.com Featured 

CONTACT

Stebelton Aranda & Snider

Family Law, Collection, Car Accident, Tax, Personal Injury

Robert J Fedor Esq LLC

Tax, International, Bankruptcy & Debt, Criminal

Maistros & Loep Ltd

Corporate, Business Organization, Estate Planning, Tax, International

Gordon Bibart Llc

Bankruptcy, Family Law, Tax, Commercial Banks

Willis & Willis Co., LPA

Employment, Power of Attorney, Medical Malpractice, Traffic, Tax

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Ohio Dept. of Taxation v. Kunkle

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, Appellee, v. KUNKLE et al., Appellant. ... Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Fulton County. ... {¶ 2} "The trial court erred in finding appellant in criminal contempt of court for allegedly giving false testimony at a July, 2004 judgment debtor ...

Ohio Dept. of Taxation v. Lomaz

{¶ 2} The trial docket before this court shows that the underlying civil action has been pending since July 1998, when appellee filed a creditor's bill against appellant. In its complaint, appellee asserted that it had not been able to collect on a judgment lien that it had obtained ...

CUMMINS PROPERTY v. FRANKLIN CTY.

... Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 106 Ohio St.3d 269, 2005-Ohio-4979, 834 NE2d 782, when it considered and rejected various arguments against using a recent, arm's-length sale price to determine the value of property for taxation purposes. ...