within 10 miles of Toledo practice in Tax Ohio


Law Offices Of Joseph V Erwin

Corporate, Trusts, Tax, Commercial Real Estate, Insurance

Mockensturm, Ltd

Trusts, Estate Planning, Litigation, Commercial Real Estate, Tax

Mockensturm, Ltd

Estate Planning, Trusts, Juvenile Law, Commercial Real Estate, Tax

Anspach Meeks Ellenberger Llp

Corporate, Tax, Personal Injury, Commercial Banks, Health Care Other

Grossman Law Offices

Personal Injury, Litigation, Family Law, Tax, Commercial Banks

Kiger & Kiger

Trusts, Corporate, Tax, Estate Planning

Watson Law Office, Llc

Estate Planning, Trusts, Elder Law, Tax

Marshall & Melhorn, LLC

Tax, Real Estate, Intellectual Property, Employment, Consumer Rights

Ohio Attorney General'S Office

Litigation, Administrative Law, Tax, Commercial Banks, Workers' Compensation

Toledo Bar Association

Contract, Bankruptcy, Employee Rights, Tax, Commercial Banks

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Ohio Dept. of Taxation v. Kunkle

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, Appellee, v. KUNKLE et al., Appellant. ... Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Fulton County. ... {¶ 2} "The trial court erred in finding appellant in criminal contempt of court for allegedly giving false testimony at a July, 2004 judgment debtor ...

Ohio Dept. of Taxation v. Lomaz

{¶ 2} The trial docket before this court shows that the underlying civil action has been pending since July 1998, when appellee filed a creditor's bill against appellant. In its complaint, appellee asserted that it had not been able to collect on a judgment lien that it had obtained ...

CUMMINS PROPERTY v. FRANKLIN CTY.

... Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 106 Ohio St.3d 269, 2005-Ohio-4979, 834 NE2d 782, when it considered and rejected various arguments against using a recent, arm's-length sale price to determine the value of property for taxation purposes. ...