21 FAQ's about "Account Stated"| A Legal Guide in Debt Collection Law
Bankruptcy & Debt Collection Bankruptcy & Debt Credit & Debt Consumer Rights Consumer Protection
Summary: Learn about debt collectors' theory of "account stated" to prove their collection account. Arm yourselves with the best defenses.
1) Account Stated is a “cause of action.” What is a cause of action?
A cause of action has two definitions:
- noun. A condition under which one party would be entitled to sue another.
- noun. A set of facts that, if true, entitle an individual or entity to be awarded a remedy by a court of law.
A cause of action is used synonymously with “theory” or “legal theory.” They’re all used to encompass a set of facts that gives a party the right to seek a legal remedy against another. In this context, it gives a creditor the right to sue for money owed.
2) What is the definition of Account Stated?
An Account Stated is a manifestation of assent by a debtor and a creditor to a stated sum as an accurate computation of an amount due to the creditor." It’s a promise to pay a pre-existing debt without promising anything new in return (“consideration”).
3) What is “Account Stated” in debt collection?
An account stated is an agreed balance between the parties. It serves as the collector’s legal theory—and the amount of money—to prove your liability for it. In New York, a mere statement of balance due, including a monthly credit card account statement, if accepted, is enough to constitute an account stated. Once accepted, the statement becomes a new contract.
4) What are the legal elements of an account stated?
To state a claim for an account stated, a plaintiff must allege:
- an account was presented;
- the account was accepted as correct; and
- the debtor promised to pay the account.
5) Is silence an admission to the statement (amount) of the account?
Yes, it can be. Not objecting to an inaccurate charge or amount within a “reasonable time” can be argued as an admission of the amount due.
6) Why do collectors use Account Stated in debt-collection cases?
Account stated is used when collectors or debt buyers want to avoid showing how the final amount was computed, and to avoid having to prove the terms of the written contract. It is a new contract that supersedes the prior, written contract. However, an account stated must attach to an “original liability” such as an underlying contract. In other words, an account stated relies on a preexisting legal relationship to form the “new” contract.
7) In New York, can an Account Stated result in a default judgment?
Yes. Clerks may issue defaults under CPLR § 3215 for unanswered complaints alleging Account Stated theories—under the following conditions:
1. The affidavit of facts or verified complaint verifies that an accounting was sent to the defendant.
2. The affidavit of facts or verified complaint must affirm that the accounting was retained by the defendant, and that no objection to it has been made.
Here is a City Court Directive, signed by Administrative Judge Fern Fisher-Brandveen in 2001, which permits the seeking of default judgments for Account Stated causes of action. The Directive rescinded the court’s earlier practice of requiring the waiver of Account-Stated theories if one or more causes of action were presented in the complaint.
8) Does the plaintiff need a signed credit-card agreement to prove an Account Stated?
No. But the plaintiff does have to prove a potential right under a preexisting relationship. Conceptually, an Account Stated forms a new, implied contract based on the old contract. It’s a second cause of action for an implied contract.
9) How did an Account-Stated claim become recognized?
Before present-day contract law, Account Stated was created for people and businesses who had an open series of accounts for various items of debit and credit. The parties convened to “compare books, memories, mutual accounts, and strike a balance.” Examples of such parties were banker and depositor, customer and grocer, and business partners.
10) Is Account Stated legally based on a preexisting contract?
Not necessarily. Tricky question though. A preexisting contract, if one was entered into, may form the basis of an Account Stated cause of action. But Account Stated can be alleged by itself (in New York) based on a business relationship alone. A preexisting contract is one way to establish a pre-existing legal relationship showing indebtedness under Account Stated.
11) What is the creditor’s burden of proof for an Account Stated claim?
Like any civil case, it is a preponderance of evidence (greater than 50%).
12) How is Account Stated different from a breach of contract?
An Account Stated establishes an implied contract whereas breach of contract traditionally refers to an expressly written contract. Account Stated is used when no contract exists, or when the plaintiff cannot prove the existence of the contract. Account Stated is an independent cause of action, which likely supersedes a cause of action for breach of contract. Account Stated, however, does not prove the validity of each charge as would a breach of contract.
13) What is the “statement” for purposes of an Account Stated claim?
Bank statements or invoices, generally. The court will honor “credible evidence of actual charges.” Of course, all business records must go through hearsay hurdles in order to be admissible. For ideas on how to attack the admissibility of business records, check out 11 Questions to Raise in a Debt-Buyer Lawsuit: Authenticity of Electronic Reproductions.
14) What is the statute of limitations for an Account Stated claim?
Six years in New York, which begins to run from your last purchase or payment. See a full discussion of the Statute of Limitations here.
15) Is Account Stated an express contract or an implied contract between the parties?
Account Stated is an implied contract based a preexisting relationship between the parties. The continuous usage of credit forms an implied contract as to the current balance. It’s a fairness principle. Borrowers would gain windfalls by lenders who simply failed to preserve all contractual evidence.
16) Why do debt collectors allege an Account Stated when their case is really based on a contract (credit-card agreement)?
Account Stated is used when creditors or debt buyers lack access to an admissible contract. It’s an additional legal theory to help creditors get paid without having to produce the contract. It also prevents windfalls to borrowers. It’s rooted in the Latin phrase, Quantum Meruit (“as much as is deserves”)—an equitable principle that prevents unfairness by compensating people who are at a loss.
17) Can debt buyers allege “Account Stated” theories?
In New York, yes. However, the statement of account must also be introduced properly as a business record. That introduction is usually done by affidavit. The affidavit must be based upon personal knowledge and otherwise be credible. An employee of the debt buyer is not qualified to produce an affidavit that authenticates an originating creditor’s account statements.
18) In New York, does silence alone prove the correctness of the creditor’s statement?
No. In fact, a New York statute prohibits these presumptions of silence. Credit-card agreements may not require that a credit-card account be deemed correct just because a consumer fails to object to it within a specified period of time. Here is the law:
General Business Law § 517 Statements of account
No agreement between the issuer and the holder shall contain any provision that a statement sent by the issuer to the holder shall be deemed correct unless objected to within a specified period of time. Any such provision is against public policy and shall be of no force or effect.
But partial payment is acknowledgment of the correctness of the account. Where there is a partial payment coupled with a promise to pay the balance, there is strong evidence of an implied agreement.
Here is an interesting Vermont case that holds that silence alone is not enough to demonstrate assent to a final balance. It reasoned that “credit card statements often contain multiple interest rates, interest rates which fluctuate from billing period to billing period, and a myriad of other kinds of fees and penalties.”
That court went on to further hold:
"While the credit cardholder, looking at the statement, can see the amount of the charges that were imposed, he or she is unlikely to know whether the charges are consistent with the writings governing the cardholder's obligations." Target Nat'l Bank/Target VISA at 11. Since credit cardholder member agreements are potentially confusing because of the format and complexity of the language, the average cardholder likely has difficulty understanding them and determining whether the charges and fees comply with the agreement. See Credit Cards, GAO-06-929. Because the Court does not agree that Ms. Cooper's silence was tantamount to assent to the accuracy of the monthly statements, the Court finds that Citibank has not proved an essential element of its account stated claim. The Court denies Citibank's Motion for Summary Judgment on the account stated theory."
Nonetheless, some courts find that silence is enough for implied consent, particularly if a consumer has regularly paid a series of statements.
19) Who has the burden of proof as to your assent to the final balance?
The collector is the one with the burden of proving all elements of its cause of action, so the collector has the burden of showing the consumer’s agreement to pay the charges and thus has the burden of showing that silence upon receiving the statement shows consent.
20) What evidence qualifies as an agreement of the amount due?
Any allegations of fact showing that you retained updated statements without objection. Also, paying the card, especially after a disputed charge, is argued as an acknowledgment of the correctness of the account.
21) How does the collector prove that I retained the statement(s) without objection?
Each case involves a different set of facts, all of which should be considered. With banks and credit-card statements, consumers are outgunned and confused as to their rights. I would guess that few objections are effectively made to statement balances. Banks rely heavily on your payments on the card as proof that you’re happy, not objecting, and therefore in acknowledgment of the current balance. Paying a credit-card statement, even a disputed credit-card statement, may infer the assent element of Account Stated.
But in Citibank (South Dakota) v. Brown-Serolvic, small payments alone do not “create the inference of assent.” Also, a bank’s affidavit must allege that the consumer received, without objection, the bank statement(s) at issue. The point here is that banks need to allege that you received the statements and did not object.
Similarly, American Express Centurion Bank v. Cutler, the court held that Amex did not allege facts showing that the consumer retained billing statements for an “unreasonable period of time” without objecting to them. Nor did the bank allege that the consumer made partial payments on the billing statements. Again, the point here is that banks need to prove all elements of an Account Stated claim if one is relied upon in the case.
At a bare minimum, the collector must prove that the statement was sent to the consumer.
Six more arguments against an Account Stated theory
- The Account Stated is only for the minimum amount owed—not the full balance (crafty).
- Under federal law, the creditor must, when challenged, prove all transactions leading up to the final balance. Credit-card holders have the burden of proof to demonstrate the full basis of the cardholder’s liability.
- An Account Stated is not consistent with moneys sought by the Plaintiff, including finance charges, prejudgment interest, fees, and attorneys’ fees. Stated another way, the plaintiff did not prove its entitlement to, and application of, fluctuating interest rates, charges, and fees with its account statements alone.
- The statements produced do not show a payment, which is the minimum requirement to show asset to the latest account. Actual payment is better proof of acknowledgment of the correctness of the account.
- Debt buyers who buy only contractual claims from the original creditor may not sue for unjust enrichment or an implied contractual theory of Account Stated.
- Account statements showing a zero balance (after charge-off) establishes zero liability.
After digging in the blog crates, I noticed that we already reported on the Amex v. Cutler, cited above, for the holding that Amex failed in its burden to prove the retained-without-objection element. In Cutler, a small payment toward the larger balance did not preserve the case, especially in light of previously disputed charges.
If you need more advice or assistance, feel free to contact us right away. We are licensed to Practice in New York only.
 Restatement (Second) of Contracts, Account Stated § 282.
 § 4:7. Account stated, 28 N.Y. Prac., Contract Law § 4:7
 National Westminster Bank USA v. Seidler, 1984-6547 (Dist. Ct. Nassau Cnty. 1984).
 0See Directive and Procedures 158, Entry of Judgment - Account Stated, Hon. Fern Fisher-Brandveen, Administrative Judge of the Civil Court of the City of New York, July 27, 2001.
 Corbin on Contracts, § 1303 at 234.
 N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 517.
 Shea & Gould v. Burr, 194 A.D.2d 369, 598 N.Y.S.2d 261 (1st Dep't 1993);
 Boulanger, Hicks, Stein & Churchill, P.C. v. Jacobs, 235 A.D.2d 353, 653 N.Y.S.2d 11 (1st Dep't 1997).
 Citibank v. Cooper, 305-10-08, Superior Court, Calendonia County (2009). See U.S. Gov't Accountability Office, Credit Cards Increased Complexity 3 in Rates andFees Heighten Need/or More Effective Disclosures to Consumers, GAO-06-929 (2006). (silence was not tantamount to assent to the accuracy of the monthly statements).
 Citibank v. Goldberg, 901 N.Y.S.2d 898 (N.Y. App. Term 2009).
 Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York. 97 A.D.3d 522948 N.Y.S.2d 331 (July 5, 2012).
 Am. Exp. Centurion Bank v. Cutler, 81 AD3d 761 (2d Dept 2011).
 Morrison, Cohen, Singer & Weinstein, L.L.P. v. Brophy, 798 N.Y.S.2d 379 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005).
 Carmody-Wait 2d § 36:174
Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer