5 Common Defenses in a Florida Criminal Case
If you are
charged with a crime here in the State of Florida, it may be necessary to take
your case to trial. The decision of whether to do so should only be made after
discussing the case at length with your criminal defense lawyer and reviewing
the evidence that the State of Florida has against you. You and your lawyer may
choose to assert a few different defenses during your jury trial. The following
are a few of the more common defenses that I have encountered while practicing
criminal law here in Florida.
1. Identity: In this defense, the
defendant contends that the wrong person is being prosecuted for the crime. The
defendant and his or her attorney argue that either the victim or a witness has
mistakenly identified the culprit. Recently, scientific studies have shown that
people often misidentify strangers when a crime has been committed.
2. Lack
of Evidence: This is a very general defense for anyone charged with a
crime. In short, the accused argues that the government has not proven the case
beyond a reasonable doubt and there is not enough evidence—either from witness
accounts or physical proof—that the defendant committed the crime.
3. Conflicts
in the Evidence: This is another very general defense that claims that
there are contradictions in the government’s case. For example, two people may
bear witness to the same crime, but one says that the defendant drove a white
Chevrolet from the scene and the other states that the defendant drove a red
Chevrolet. The law allows the jury to determine if conflicts in the evidence
exist and gives them the power to find someone not guilty based on these contradictions.
4. Self
Defense: The affirmative defense of self-defense is often an issue when
someone is charged with a violent crime such as battery, aggravated battery, or
murder. With a self-defense strategy, a person charged with a violent act alleges
that he or she injured another because of fear and/or perceived danger posed from
the other person. If you assert the defense of self-defense, you admit to
committing the crime in question, but contend that you should not be convicted
because you did so only to protect yourself or someone else.
5. Not
Guilty by Reason of Insanity: This defense usually only comes up in murder
cases, and requires the defense to call in an expert witness to testify about
the mental state of the defendant at the time of the crime. In accordance with Florida
law, the following truths are required for insanity to be established:
(a) The
defendant had a mental infirmity, disease, or defect; and
(b) Because
of this condition, the defendant:
1. Did
not know what he or she was doing or the action’s consequences; or
2. Although
the defendant knew what he or she was doing and the action’s consequences, the
defendant did not know that what he or she was doing was wrong.