A look into the future with self-driving cars…

by Jason Scott Collver on Nov. 02, 2018

Criminal Criminal  DUI-DWI 

Summary: A look into the future with self-driving cars…

A week does not go by where self-driving cars make the news in some way or another. Just a few headlines that come to mind are Uber’s self-driving car killed an individual crossing the street, Tesla driver claims car was in autonomous mode when stopped for DUI, Tesla driver claims autonomous mode caused car to strike barrier, and the list goes on and on.

Self-driving cars not only are coming, but they are here and some form or fashion whether you like it or not. Lets talk about the effects self-driving cars might have within the law.

Crimes with self-driving cars

There are a lot of crimes that everyday people can commit in a car, but what if you were in a self-driving car?

Speeding for example…

Who is to blame if you are stopped for speeding in a self-driving car, is it the driver or the car manufacturer? At this point in time, the answer is likely still the driver, but that very well could change over time.

Image result for google self driving carAt the moment, most self-driving cars give the driver the option to operate the vehicle in an autonomous mode or the good ole fashion driver control. The only self-driving car that has no human override is Google’s car and it tops out a 30 mph. Not likely to get a speeding ticket in this car, but maybe you get a driving too slowly.

A self-driving car seems like a good way to get out of a DUI

Related imageWell this is the defense a California man is giving a shot in defending his January 2018 DUI. There is not one car with an autonomous feature on the market that this defense would likely work with in Tennessee.

You are probably wondering why a person in a self-driving car with the autonomous feature activated could be charged with DUI in Tennessee. The reason is, Tennessee has a physical control aspect to the DUI law. This is most frequently seen when an individual is charged with DUI for sleeping it off in a parking lot. The state’s theory is that the individual sleeping it off in the car has the ability to operate the vehicle.

This is likely the same theory the state would use in prosecuting a person who claims the vehicle was operating in autonomous mode. The state would claim the individual could have taken over control of the vehicle at anytime so the individual is on physical control of the vehicle.

So even if you own a Tesla or other self-driving vehicle, it is still best to get an Uber after a few drinks.

Car accidents and self-driving cars

Image result for uber self-driving carsWhat if you are in a car accident and the at fault vehicle was a self-driving vehicle in autonomous mode? Who is really at fault for the accident, the driver, the company who manufactured the vehicle, the company that wrote the autonomous driving software, or some other party? The answer is we do not know. Most lawyers would sue anyone they think is at fault and until self-driving cars are more prevalent that seems the most prudent course of action.

A good yet unfortunate example of this is an accident that occurred in March between an Uber self-driving car and a pedestrian. The pedestrian was killed when she crossed the street in front of an Uber self-driving vehicle in autonomous mode. The police who investigated the accident cleared the autonomous vehicle of fault.

Self-driving cars are here and are not going anywhere anytime soon. When searching for an attorney, it is important to choice an attorney that is up-to-date with the effects technology has on the law and law on technology.

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.