Could the definition of an "accredited investor"?  The answer is yes, but it would have limits. 

H.R. 2187, or the “Fair Investment Opportunities for Professional Experts Act” Sponsored by Rep. David Schweikert (R-AZ) and co-sponsored by Rep. Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ), the legislation would expand the definition of an "accredited investor." While the income and net worth limits would stay in place, the proposed legislation would broaden the scope of the current "accredited investor" definition to include any natural person:

  • who is a licensed or registered as a broker investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), or a state level equivalent division;
  • who is licensed attorney in good standing under the laws of the jurisdictions in which he or she is admitted to practice law;
  • who is a registered CPA in good standing under the laws of the place of his or her residence or principal office;
  • who has retained and used the services of any person referred to in numbers 1-3 above to make an investment decision relative to the subject investment being offered; or
  • who has passed an examination administered by FINRA.

On February 1, the House of Representatives approved the bill by an overwhelming 347-8 vote. The legislation now goes to the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee.  

The original proposed bill was intended to change the definition of accredited investor under Rule 501 (17 C.F.R. 230.501). This is the definition we all know and the one that runs through Regulation D (including Rule 506(c)). In the current bill, the concept of changing Rule 501 has been completely abandoned. Instead the amended bill proposes to change the definition of accredited investor under Section 2(a)(15) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77b(a)(15)). This definition, while it has always been the same as Rule 501 (see Rule 215 – 17 CFR 230.215) is only used for offerings made under Section 4(a)(5) of the 33 Act.

While I believe this is still a move in the right direction, it won't create an entirely new category of "accredited investors" for the crowdfunding space.   



Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.