The parties stipulated that said alimony obligation was non-modifiable as to term, but modifiable as to amount. At the time of the divorce, the wife had secured a teaching position earning slightly above $30,000 annually. The ex-husband’s financial affidavit indicated he was earning approximately $866 gross per week from self-employment.
Following the parties’ divorce, the ex-husband closed his broker/dealer business, as well as a financial planning business. Although he owned several pieces of real property, the ex-husband was in arrears on mortgage payments associated with one home, and had very little, if any, equity in other properties. Additionally, the ex-husband owned a local restaurant for which he owed tens of thousands of dollars in un-paid taxes. At the time of the post judgment hearing, the ex-husband’s updated financial affidavit indicated he was earning just over $2,000 gross per week. The ex-wife’s financial affidavit indicated she was earning $71,000 gross per year from her teaching position.
The Court’s Decision
In reviewing the legal standard governing motions for contempt, the Court noted that it may not find a person in contempt without considering the circumstances surrounding the violation to determine whether such violation was willful. However, even where a party is unable to meet his or her financial obligations, a party may not engage in self-help. Orders of the court are to be obeyed until modified or successfully challenged.
In this particular case, the Court found that the ex-husband failed to make a reasonable effort to pay even part of his alimony obligation, despite income he was receiving from consulting work. As the Court pointed out, he owed forty-eight weeks of alimony as of May, 2012. Even though the ex-husband filed a motion to modify his alimony obligation, which the Court ultimately granted, it nevertheless penalized the ex-husband for his noncompliance. In fact, in addition to ordering the ex-husband to pay the ex-wife’s counsel fees, it ordered him to pay $3,000 as a sanction for his failure to comply with the Judge’s original order.
Maya Murphy P.C. has proudly been included in the 2024 Edition of Best Law Firms®, ranked among the top firms in the nation. In addition, Managing Partner Joseph C. Maya has been selected to The Best Lawyers in America® 2024 for his work in Employment Law and Education Law in Connecticut. Recognition in Best Lawyers® is awarded to firms and attorneys who demonstrate excellence in the industry, and is widely regarded by both clients and legal professionals as a significant honor.
Our firm in Westport, Connecticut serves clients with legal assistance all over the state, including the towns of: Ansonia, Beacon Falls, Bethany, Bethel, Branford, Bridgeport, Brookfield, Cheshire, Danbury, Darien, Derby, East Haven, Easton, Fairfield, Greenwich, Guilford, Hamden, Madison, Meriden, Middlebury, Milford, Monroe, Naugatuck, New Canaan, New Fairfield, New Haven, Newton, North Branford, North Haven, Norwalk, Orange, Oxford, Prospect, Redding, Ridgefield, Seymour, Shelton, Sherman, Southbury, Stamford, Stratford, Trumbull, Wallingford, Waterbury, West Haven, Weston, Westport, Wilton, and Woodbridge. In addition to assisting clients in Connecticut, our firm handles education law and employment law matters in New York as well.
If you have any questions about employment law or education law in Connecticut, or would like to speak to an attorney about a legal matter, please contact Joseph C. Maya and the other experienced attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. at (203) 221-3100 or JMaya@Mayalaw.com to schedule a free initial consultation today.
