Court Holds Connecticut Nursing Home Liable in Wrongful Death Claim

by Joseph C. Maya on Mar. 24, 2017

Accident & Injury Accident & Injury  Wrongful Death Accident & Injury  Medical Malpractice 

Summary: Blog post about a case against a nursing home for wrongful death and medical malpractice.

Contact the personal injury attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. today. We can help you get the just compensation you deserve for your injuries or those of a loved one. For a free initial consultation, call 203-221-3100 or email JMaya@Mayalaw.com.

In the case of Coulombe v. Aaron Manor, Inc., an administratrix sued a nursing center, two doctors, and a medical group, for wrongful death and medical malpractice. The group filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the claims against it because it was not a legal entity and did not have the capacity to be sued. The administratrix requested the opportunity to amend her complaint. The adminstratrix alleged the doctors were negligent in caring for the decedent, whom died as a result of an infection under their care, aas they were acting within the scope of their employment with the group. In this respect, the group was vicariously liable for the negligent care. The group argued that it was merely a trade name, not a legal entity; therefore, the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over it.

The court held that as the group's trade name certificate described it as a partnership, and no evidence contradicted the presumption created by Connecticut law that this description was correct, it would be deemed a partnership and thus could be sued in its own name. . If the group later presented evidence that the group was merely a trade name, the adminstratrix could amend the complaint to name the proper entity because: (1) she intended to sue the proper party, (2) there was no evidence that her error misled the proper party to its prejudice, and (3) the error was caused by the proper party's failure to correct the inaccuracies in group’s trade name certificate, as it was required to do under Connecticut law and policiy.

The group's motion to dismiss was denied. If evidence was later presented that showed that the group was a trade name that was being used by another entity or person, plaintiff could amend her complaint to name that entity or person in lieu of the group. If this occurred, plaintiff's claim against this party would relate back to the service of the original process.

At Maya Murphy, P.C., our personal injury attorneys are dedicated to achieving the best results for individuals and their family members and loved ones whose daily lives have been disrupted by injury, whether caused by a motor vehicle or pedestrian accident, a slip and fall, medical malpractice, a defective product, or otherwise. Our attorneys are not afraid to aggressively pursue and litigate cases and have extensive experience litigating personal injury matters in both state and federal courts, and always with regard to the unique circumstances of our client and the injury he or she has sustained. 

Please contact Joseph C. Maya, Esq., at 203-221-3100, or at JMaya@mayalaw.com, to schedule a free consultation.

For continuous access to the legal world, follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn. We offer the latest updates on caselaw and legal news. In addition, informational videos are available for your convenience on our YouTube channel. 

Source: Coulombe v. Aaron Manor, Inc., 2007 Conn. Super. LEXIS 2240 (Conn. Super. Ct. Aug. 20, 2007)

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.