Ask A Lawyer

Tell Us Your Case Information for Fastest Lawyer Match!

Please include all relevant details from your case including where, when, and who it involoves.
Case details that can effectively describe the legal situation while also staying concise generally receive the best responses from lawyers.


By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided may not be privileged or confidential.

FDA STRENGTHENS RULES ON TRANSVAGINAL MESH

by Darren Anthony Miller on Apr. 14, 2018

 General Practice 

Summary: This week the FDA responded to concerns about the safety of mesh implants to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in women. They have been reclassified with its highest risk category and manufacturers of existing products must submit premarket approval applications within 30 months.

This week the FDA responded to concerns about the safety of mesh implants to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in women. They have been reclassified with its highest risk category and manufacturers of existing products must submit premarket approval applications within 30 months. According to a statement by the FDA, the applications are required “to support the safety and effectiveness” of the mesh products.

POP is caused when the bladder, bowel and uterus are no longer supported by weakened or stretched pelvic floor muscles. Women may develop POP as a result of childbirth, hysterectomy, or menopause. If left untreated, POP can cause pain and urinary leakage.

In the 1990s, gynecologists started using surgical mesh transvaginally to repair POP, reinforcing pelvic muscles and reducing recuperation time. The FDA okayed the first mesh device for this purpose in 2002 and now 5 different manufacturers market a transvaginal mesh product. Unfortunately, the FDA began to log increased reports of adverse events among patients treated with transvaginal mesh. Complications include pain during intercourse, infection and organ perforation.  In 2011, they recommended that more data was needed.

These final requirements include reclassifying transvaginal POP mesh treatment from Class II to the higher risk Class III and requiring premarket approval applications by July 5, 2018. These orders apply only to mesh used in POP repair and not other surgical mesh uses.

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Women that have suffered because of transvaginal mesh implants are filing lawsuits against the manufacturers of these devices. Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific are currently defendants in suits alleging the mesh products have caused pain and injury. Last spring, Boston Scientific paid $119M to settle around 3000 cases and recently, Johnson & Johnson was ordered to pay a woman plaintiff $12.5M after a jury determined she had be seriously injured by their Ethicon Profit mesh implant. Another leading manufacturer, Endo International, has announced that they will be settling cases instead of dragging them out in court.

We are still excepting cases on behalf of women that may have suffered unfairly because of a potentially defective medical device. If you have had POP repair done with transvaginal mesh, you too might qualify for a financial claim. You can find out instantly by simply calling our toll-free legal hotline, 855-776-5299. You will receive a free evaluation of your situation and no-obligation information on how to proceed with your claim. Join thousands of women that have decided they have a legal right to be heard! As there may be a time limit to file your case, please contact us now to reserve your consultation.

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.