Federal Court Holds Mexican Separation Agreement Valid

author by Joseph C. Maya on May. 03, 2017

Divorce & Family Law Divorce & Family Law  Divorce Civil & Human Rights  Constitutional Law 

Summary: Blog post about the validity of a divorce agreement that was granted in Mexico.

If you have questions about divorce, legal separation, alimony pendente lite, or alimony in Connecticut, please feel free to call the experienced divorce attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. in Westport today at 203-221-3100 or email Joseph C. Maya, Esq. at JMaya@Mayalaw.com.

A separation of property agreement between an ex-wife and an ex-husband was not invalid merely because the couple had obtained a Mexican divorce. The agreement had been duly submitted for the consideration of the Mexican court.

On January 11, 1966, the plaintiff was granted divorce in a civil court of Mexico, on the ground of incompatibility of temperament. The divorce decree mentioned a contractual agreement between the parties, and ordered the parties to comply with all of the contract’s terms and conditions. The agreement provided that the defendant, during his lifetime, would pay to the plaintiff $30 weekly for life or until her remarriage. It also provided for an assignment by the defendant to the plaintiff of all interest in his trust fund. The defendant motioned for the dismissal of this obligation in Connecticut Federal Court, on the allegation that the contract was invalid, and held no authority in United States jurisdiction. The  court found no issue with the validity of the Mexican divorce, because the each party was fully represented by counsel during the proceeding and the agreement was submitted to the court for approval and confirmed, ratified and incorporated by reference during the divorce decree. The court concluded that the agreement was designed for the certain transfers of personal property and shares of stock made at the time of the divorce. There was no attack or objection to the agreement during the initial divorce proceeding. The fact that the parties were no longer domiciled in Mexico was not relevant.

For a free consultation, please do not hesitate to call the experienced family law and divorce attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. in Westport, CT at 203-221-3100. We may also be reached for inquiries by email at JMaya@mayalaw.com.

Source: Walden v. Lattarulo, 269 A.2d 250; 6. Conn. Cit. Ct. 118 (Conn. Cir. 1969)

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.

© 2025 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.