GM Bankruptcy May Impact Victims’ Rights

by on Feb. 22, 2010

Consumer Rights Consumer Protection 

Summary: Bankruptcy rendered the new GM Corporation immune from important liability. However, victims of accidents who filed claims prior to bankruptcy may still be entitled to voice their objections.

Where there once was Chrysler and General Motors, there is now “Old Chrysler” and “New Chrysler,” “Old GM” and “New GM.” The “new” companies will be liable to consumers under the same regulations that govern all auto manufactures in the United States. While the new companies will be held liable to consumers under the same laws that govern all automobile manufacturers in the United States, the old companies may, by virtue of their bankruptcy settlements, escape liability for injuries sustained by thousands of Americans. And although GM has assumed a great deal more responsibility than Chrysler, the extent of GM’s liability has yet to be finally determined.

Terms of the Bankruptcies

When GM and Chrysler began restructuring, they faced difficult questions about the likelihood of company survival. Chrysler spokesperson Mike Palese insisted that avoiding significant liability was key to the company’s future viability. Chrysler was thus granted immunity from any future liability actions (with the exception of “lemon law” claims filed prior to the bankruptcy) concerning accidents involving cars built before it filed for bankruptcy. Therefore, Chrysler cannot be sued for accidents involving any of its cars built before April 2009. It remains to be seen if Chrysler’s lack of responsibility will create enough animosity among consumers that shirking liability will ultimately endanger the new company’s success.

New GM, like new Chrysler, will not be held liable for any claims filed against GM before it filed for bankruptcy. People who won suits against GM or filed claims against the company prior to June 1, 2009 can only hold “Old GM” liable. As “Old GM” will soon lack meaningful assets, it is likely that those who filed suit with GM prior to the bankruptcy will not be able to recover the damages they are owed.

Seeking Justice

Approximately 300 Americans have been left without meaningful remedy by GM’s bankruptcy settlement. The Ad Hoc Committee of Consumer Victims of General Motors, a group of attorneys who represent the 300 Americans who filed lawsuits against GM prior to the bankruptcy, values these claims at over $1.25 billion. Many of their clients have suffered devastating injuries from alleged vehicle defects including paralysis and brain damage. Under the GM restructuring, these claims must be paid like unsecured creditor debt — that is, out of old GM’s virtually worthless assets.

It is unclear at this time what recourse the 300 Americans who filed claims against GM before the bankruptcy might have against new and old GM. Several victims of claims filed against GM before its bankruptcy may still have the chance to be heard. Several individual accident litigants have filed an appeal before the United States Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York, objecting to the restructuring of the GM Corporation in bankruptcy.

Until the appeal is completed, it will be the responsibility of the public to inform lawmakers as to whether it is acceptable in their opinions for consumer rights and protections to be sacrificed in the name of protecting the future economic interests of big business.

For Further Reference

If you or someone you love has been injured in an accident involving a defective vehicle, please contact an experienced personal injury attorney.

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.