Government Resumes Accepting Certain DACA Requests in Response to Court Order

author by Alexander J. Segal on Dec. 03, 2018

Immigration Immigration  Deportation Immigration  Visa 

Summary: On January 13, 2018, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it has resumed accepting requests for renewal under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program in response to a court order.

immigration attorney nycIntroduction

On January 13, 2018, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it has resumed accepting requests for renewal under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program in response to a court order [PDF version]. The USCIS explained that “unless otherwise provided … the DACA policy will be operated on the terms in place before it was rescinded on Sept. 5, 2017.”

Before continuing with this post, please see our articles on the decision to rescind the DACA memorandum (regularly updated with new developments) [see article] and the court order enjoining the DACA rescission [see article].

Renewal Process and Applicability

Individuals who were previously granted DACA relief may file for renewal. In order to apply for renewal, the applicant must properly file the following USCIS forms:

- Form I-821D, Consideration of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals;
- Form I-765, Application For Employment Authorization; and
- Form I-765 Worksheet.

It is important to note that even under this policy, the USCIS is not accepting requests from individuals who have never before been granted DACA relief. Furthermore, the USCIS is not accepting or approving any advance parole requests from DACA recipients.

Instead, the only individuals now eligible for DACA renewal are those who:

- Previously received DACA; and
- Whose DACA benefits expired on or after September 5, 2016.

Those two requirements mean that individuals who previously received DACA, but whose DACA benefits expired before September 5, 2016, are not eligible to request DACA as a renewal. This is because DACA renewal applications must be filed within one year of the expiration of when DACA benefits expired. However, such individuals may file new initial DACA requests in accord with the Form I-821D and Form I-765 instructions. This is because such individuals are covered by the recent court order.

Conclusion

The USCIS is, for now, complying with the court orders from Judge William Alsup of the United States District Court for the District of Northern California in re-implementing DACA as it existed prior to September 5, 2017. As we noted in our article on the initial injunction, the Government is expected to appeal from Judge Alsup's decision in the near future. Furthermore, for a variety of reasons, the Government likely has a good chance at obtaining a stay of the injunction and ultimately prevailing in the litigation. However, that does not change the fact that for at least a limited period, individuals who previously received DACA may seek DACA renewal or file new initial DACA applications. Because this policy change may be short-lived, those who are affected and interested in applying should consult with an experienced immigration attorney immediately for a consultation and case-specific guidance.

We will continue to update the website with information on this important issue as it becomes available.

Please visit the nyc immigration lawyers website for further information. The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC focuses vast segment of its practice on immigration law. This steadfast dedication has resulted in thousands of immigrants throughout the United States.

Lawyer website: http://myattorneyusa.com

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.

© 2025 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.