Johnson & Johnson Loses $55 Million in Cancer Lawsuit

by Joseph C. Maya on Jun. 12, 2017

Accident & Injury Products Liability Lawsuit & Dispute  Class Action 

Summary: A blog post about the results of a class action against the Johnson & Johnson company for a link between ovarian cancer and their talcum powder product.

Contact the personal injury attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. today. We can help you get the just compensation you deserve for your injuries of those of a loved one. For a free initial consultation, call 203-221-3100 or email JMaya@Mayalaw.com.

As Johnson & Johnson is ordered to pay $55 million in a talcum powder side effects lawsuit, more lawsuits are being filed alleging certain talcum powders are actually dangerous products linked to ovarian cancer. The $55 million award is the second large award handed out in Johnson & Johnson talcum powder lawsuits in recent months.

In February, a jury awarded $75 million to the family of Jacqueline Fox, who allegedly developed ovarian cancer after using talcum powder for more than 35 years. Fox died at age 52 of ovarian cancer, before the lawsuit was completed. During the lawsuit, her attorneys alleged Johnson & Johnson knew its talcum powder was linked to ovarian cancer but failed to warn consumers about the risks. A jury agreed with Fox’s family, finding Johnson & Johnson liable for conspiracy, failure to warn and negligence.

Among the award were $10 million in compensatory damages and $62 million in punitive damages. Johnson & Johnson has indicated it will appeal the jury’s decision.

In May, a jury in St. Louis ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay $55 million to Gloria Ristesund, who blamed her ovarian cancer on years of talcum powder use. That award included $5 million in compensatory damages and $50 million in punitive damages. Reports indicate Johnson & Johnson will appeal this award, as well.

Although Johnson & Johnson has said there is no link between the use of talcum powder and ovarian cancer, attorneys for the plaintiffs argued that studies have shown since the 1970s that talcum powder could be linked to ovarian cancer. Further, they alleged, internal documents suggest Johnson & Johnson was aware of the studies but failed to act on them.

According to Bloomberg (3/21/16), more than 1,000 plaintiffs have filed claims against Johnson & Johnson, alleging the company knew about the risks associated with using talcum powder, putting their health at risk. Seventeen plaintiffs from New Mexico recently filed claims regarding their use of talcum powder. The Albuquerque Journal (5/16/16) reports that 15 of those plaintiffs are women alleging they developed ovarian cancer after using talcum powder. The other two claims are from the estates of two women who died from ovarian cancer.

Although Johnson & Johnson says the science does not back claims that talcum powder is linked to ovarian cancer, the International Agency for Research on Cancer isn’t so sure. “Perineal use of talc-based body powder is possibly carcinogenic to humans, the agency concluded in a 2010 report on carcinogenic risks.

While the science might not be clear, women who used talcum powder and developed ovarian cancer are now filing lawsuits, saying they should have been warned about the potential risk.

At Maya Murphy, P.C., our personal injury attorneys are dedicated to achieving the best results for individuals and their family members and loved ones whose daily lives have been disrupted by injury, whether caused by a motor vehicle or pedestrian accident, a slip and fall, medical malpractice, a defective product, or otherwise. Our attorneys are not afraid to aggressively pursue and litigate cases and have extensive experience litigating personal injury matters in both state and federal courts, and always with regard to the unique circumstances of our client and the injury he or she has sustained.

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.