JUST WHEN YOU THOUGHT THE EB-5 REQUIREMENTS COULD NOT BE MORE STRINGENT… THINK AGAIN!

by Jeanny Tsoi on Jan. 15, 2020

Immigration 

Summary: New EB-5 Rules

Once upon a time, the EB-5 petition was perceived to be one of the “easiest” ways for foreign entrepreneurs and investors to obtain permanent residency.  Invest $500,000 or $1 million into a new U.S. enterprise…create 10 jobs for U.S. workers (indirect job creation is permitted for regional centers), and get your green card.  But it is no longer that easy.

 

 

            Currently, USCIS takes about 27.5 to 49 months (so possibly 4+ years) to adjudicate the initial EB-5 petition, also known as I-526.  This petition must be approved before the investor can apply for a conditional green card, which is only valid for 2 years.  Within 90 days before the 2-year anniversary, the investor may file an I-829 petition to apply for a 10-year green card.  The processing time for this petition is another 29 to 49 months.

 

 

If the long wait time is not discouraging enough, on July 24, 2019, USCIS published a final rule that makes it even harder for investors to fulfill EB-5 requirements.  The final rule made a number of significant changes to the EB-5 program.  The following are the most noteworthy and may further deter investors from applying for an EB-5 green card:

 

  • Increase in investment amounts: For targeted employment areas (“TEA”), the required investment amount has increased from $500,000 to $900,000.  For other locations, the investment amount has increased from $1 million to $1.8 million.  The minimum investment amounts will automatically adjust for inflation every 5 years.
  • TEA designation is exclusive to DHS: Under the new rule, states will no longer have the power to designate geographic and political subdivisions as high-unemployment areas, which in turn would warrant the reduced investment amount.  Rather, the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) will directly make such designations.

 

The effective date for the final rule is November 21, 2019.

 

 

Alternatives?

 

 

            Yes!  For foreign nationals who wish to establish a business in the United States, and want to “avoid” the EB-5 program, they may consider the 1) L-1A petition for intracompany transferee executive or manager or 2) E-2 petition for treaty investor. 

 

 

The L-1A and E-2 petitions are preferred over EB-5 because:

 

  • premium processing option is available.  This means, by paying an additional filing fee of $1,410, USCIS will guarantee a response within 15 calendar days.  The response may be an approval notice, a request for evidence (“RFE”), a notice of intent to deny, or a denial notice.  Based on our experience, the first 2 scenarios – approval notice and RFE – are more likely to occur.  In short, this option avoids the 49-month waiting period (see above).
  • A minimum investment amount is not required.
  • A minimum employee amount is not required.
  • U.S. work authorization is given once L-1A or E-2 is approved, while EB-5 approval does not allow the petitioner to work or stay in the United States until a green card application is filed.

 

To learn more about the L-1A and E-2 petitions, please refer to our previous article – “Alternatives to the Stringent EB-5 Petition – L-1A & E-2 Visas.”

 

 

Conclusion

 

 

Despite the new changes to the EB-5 program, foreign investors and entrepreneurs still have alternative avenues to achieve the “American Dream.”  If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office.  We offer free in-person consultations.  U.S. immigration law is complex, which is why you need experienced immigration attorneys to guide and advise you through the process.  We are those lawyers, and our firm practices immigration law exclusively.  We have offices in Orange, Fresno, Riverside, Sacramento, San Bruno, California, as well as Orem and Salt Lake City, Utah, and Boise, Idaho.

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.

Now Chatting...