Lack of Consent in Hospital's Use of X-Ray Found Reckless

by Joseph C. Maya on May. 01, 2017

Accident & Injury Medical Malpractice Accident & Injury  Personal Injury Lawsuit & Dispute  Lawsuit 

Summary: Blog post about a plaintiff who sued a hospital for not getting consent to perform an x-ray on her and subsequently injuring her.

Contact the personal injury attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. today. We can help you get the just compensation you deserve for your injuries or those of a loved one. For a free initial consultation, call 203-221-3100 or email JMaya@Mayalaw.com.

Plaintiff patient filed a second revised complaint against defendant hospital and set forth five counts sounding in medical malpractice, intentional assault and battery, negligent assault and battery, recklessness, and fraudulent misrepresentation of medical records. The hospital filed a motion to strike the counts of recklessness and fraudulent misrepresentation of the medical records.

In response to the patient's suit alleging medical malpractice, intentional assault and battery, negligent assault and battery, recklessness, and fraudulent misrepresentation of medical records, the hospital filed a motion to strike the counts of recklessness and fraudulent misrepresentation. The court denied the motion to strike. The court found that, after construing the complaint in a manner most favorable to the patient, there was a sufficient factual basis to support a cause of action for recklessness because the hospital's employees performed an x-ray examination on the patient without her consent and over her objection. Concerning the assertion of fraudulent misrepresentation, the court found that, if true, the facts stated by the patient in her allegation were sufficient to support the claim. The court denied the hospital's motion to strike two counts of the complaint.

At Maya Murphy, P.C., our personal injury attorneys are dedicated to achieving the best results for individuals and their family members and loved ones whose daily lives have been disrupted by injury, whether caused by a motor vehicle or pedestrian accident, a slip and fall, medical malpractice, a defective product, or otherwise. Our attorneys are not afraid to aggressively pursue and litigate cases and have extensive experience litigating personal injury matters in both state and federal courts, and always with regard to the unique circumstances of our client and the injury he or she has sustained.

Source: Woolcock v. Sharon Hosp., 1996 Conn. Super. LEXIS 39 (Conn. Super. Ct. Jan. 11, 1996)

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.